George Air Force Base (AFB) Disposal and Reuse, San Bernardino County
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 488 pages
File Size : 34,38 MB
Release : 1992
Category :
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 488 pages
File Size : 34,38 MB
Release : 1992
Category :
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 26,68 MB
Release : 1992
Category :
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 350 pages
File Size : 32,76 MB
Release : 1990
Category :
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 518 pages
File Size : 44,95 MB
Release : 2002
Category :
ISBN :
Author : United States. Air Force
Publisher :
Page : pages
File Size : 46,21 MB
Release : 1990
Category : Environmental impact analysis
ISBN :
Author : United States. Department of the Air Force
Publisher :
Page : pages
File Size : 14,35 MB
Release : 1992
Category : Air bases
ISBN :
Author : Edward James Blakely
Publisher :
Page : 338 pages
File Size : 42,63 MB
Release : 1993
Category : City planning
ISBN :
Author : United States. Department of the Air Force
Publisher :
Page : pages
File Size : 45,62 MB
Release : 1991
Category : Air bases
ISBN :
Author : United States. Department of the Air Force
Publisher :
Page : pages
File Size : 30,93 MB
Release : 1991
Category : Air bases
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 472 pages
File Size : 50,62 MB
Release : 1992
Category :
ISBN :
On January 5, 1989, the Secretary of Defense announced the closure of George AFB, California, pursuant to the Base Closure and Realignment Act. Previous environmental documentation culminated in the filing of a Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Closure of George AFB on May 4,1990. A record of Decision (ROD) for the action was signed June 20, 1990. The base is scheduled for closure December 15, 1992. This EIS has been prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act to analyze the potential environmental consequences of the disposal and reasonable alternatives for reuse of the base. The document includes analyses of the potential impacts each alternative may have on the local community, including land use and aesthetics, transportation, utilities, hazardous materials/wastes, geology and soils, water resources, air quality, noise, biological resources and cultural resources. Potential environmental impacts are increased aircraft-related noise levels, increased traffic, reduced wildlife habitat, alteration of topography, alteration of water flow and drainage patterns, and temporary effects of elevated concentrations of particulate matter during construction. Traffic mitigations include contributions to area roadway Improvements. If avoidance of biological resources is not adequate or possible, mitigation in the form of replacement, restoration, or enhancement is possible.