Government Property Furnished to DOD Contractors


Book Description










Government Equipment Furnished to DOD Contractors


Book Description




Government Operations


Book Description

GAO discussed problems that the Department of Defense (DOD) has in controlling and accounting for property it furnishes to defense contractors to develop, produce, and maintain weapons systems and support military installations. GAO found that: (1) DOD furnishes billions of dollars in property to defense contractors each year; (2) until August 1986, there was no system in place for reporting the value of government property furnished to contractors; (3) although recent data show that the total amount of property on hand is about $26 billion, the figure may be larger because contractor records do not adequately account for this property and DOD has no overall system to verify contractors records; (4) DOD has not effectively implemented policies for relying on contractors to provide the property needed in government contracts; (5) DOD has not adequately implemented regulations designed to control contractor materiel requisitions; and (6) DOD has not adequately enforced acquisition regulations that require contractors to account for and safeguard government property and the government to maintain oversight over contractor management of the property. GAO believes that new DOD property policies should minimize potential fraud, waste, and abuse of government property, if properly implemented.










Government Equipment


Book Description

GAO studied the progress the Department of Defense (DOD) has made in implementing its policy of minimizing the amount of government-furnished equipment (GFE) it provides to contractors. GAO found that at the end of fiscal year 1984, contractors had over $8.4 billion of GFE in their possession, but noted that its estimate might not be accurate because DOD and the services did not know how much GFE contractors had acquired, discarded, or transferred. GAO also found that DOD has not minimized the amount of GFE it provides because: (1) applicable portions of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and the DOD FAR Supplement are too broad; (2) contractors generally lack incentives to furnish their own equipment; and (3) DOD and the services have provided insufficient guidance to program managers and procurement officials on the appropriate uses of GFE. In addition, GAO found that: (1) a substantial portion of GFE is located at government-owned, contractor-operated (GOCO) plants which DOD and the services have not attempted to sell; (2) DOD has not sold some GFE because it is uncertain about its legal authority to sell excess equipment directly to contractors; (3) DOD does not adequately oversee contractors' acquisition, retention, and disposal of GFE; (4) some contractors ignore established controls over GFE, with DOD concurrence; (5) contractors frequently acquire GFE from commercial sources, without checking government inventories; (6) contractors frequently fail to dispose of excess equipment or properly document GFE transfers; and (7) DOD is developing a database for property managers to monitor GFE.




DOD Financial Management


Book Description

DOD’s lack of accountability over government property in the possession of contractors has been reported by auditors for decades. This long-standing issue affects the accounting and reporting of GFP and is one of the reasons DOD is unable to produce auditable financial statements. DOD estimated the value of its GFP at over $220 billion; however, that amount is likely significantly understated. This report, developed in connection with fulfilling GAO’s mandate to audit the U.S. government’s consolidated financial statements, examines the (1) challenges DOD has encountered in department-wide efforts to address weaknesses related to its accounting for GFP and (2) extent to which DOD has developed a department-wide strategy to address the GFP-related material weakness. GAO is making three recommendations, specifically, for DOD to (1) document and implement a process for memorandum distribution and for reviewing components’ compliance, (2) document procedures for how the Council and related oversight groups will function, and (3) develop a comprehensive strategy to clearly articulate the detailed DOD-wide efforts to address the GFP material weakness.