Government Performance and Results Act Performance Measure for DOD Total Asset Visibility


Book Description

This is the first of two reports addressing total asset visibility. This report discusses the effectiveness of the DoD Total Asset Visibility Program as it relates to the Government Performance and Results Act Performance Measure 2.3.5, "Visibility and Accessibility of DoD Materiel Assets." A second report will discuss the effectiveness of the Joint Total Asset Visibility Program. The DoD Total Asset Visibility Program, managed by the Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Logistics and Materiel Readiness), was an initiative aimed at achieving visibility over 100 percent of DoD materiel assets. The goal of the DoD Total Asset Visibility Program was to provide DoD users with timely, accurate information on the location, movement, status, and identity of military assets 1 and the capability to perform transactions using that information. The DoD Total Asset Visibility capability was developed in large part by integrating existing and evolving business systems employed by the Services and the Defense Logistics Agency. Visibility of assets has been a concern for the Services for many years. Lessons learned from Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm brought out the seriousness of the problem. During Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm, the responsiveness of the logistics system was degraded by thousands of duplicate orders placed because operational units had inadequate visibility over the status of their requisitions, particularly for critical items. Moreover, an enormous amount of materiel was shipped to the theater but was not readily available to U.S. forces because of poor control and visibility of the assets.




Defense Inventory


Book Description




Defense Inventory


Book Description

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Department of Defense's (DOD) implementation of its Total Asset Visibility (TAV) initiative, focusing on: (1) the difficulty in determining the status of the initiative's implementation; (2) planning weaknesses that affect the initiative's implementation; and (3) strategies for addressing those weaknesses. GAO noted that: (1) DOD lacks an adequate Departmentwide management framework for providing information to clearly determine the progress made in realizing TAV initiative goals; (2) while some component and theater-specific asset tracking capabilities are reported to be operating, Departmentwide information on progress in achieving TAV initiative goals is minimal; (3) although implementing improved asset visibility is a high-priority objective, DOD cannot clearly understand the extent to which it is achieving the objectives of having timely, accurate information on requisitions and assets and access to DOD assets; (4) along with the unclear picture of the initiative's status, planning is inadequate at the strategic and implementation levels; (5) DOD does not have a Departmentwide TAV strategic plan to show how the various TAV initiatives contribute to DOD's goals for the initiative; (6) additionally, while DOD has an implementation plan, the plan has a number of key weaknesses; (7) it does not describe how TAV will be integrated into Department work processes to realize the goals set for the TAV initiative; (8) as a result, there is confusion over who is to use TAV and how it is to be used; (9) at some locations the system is being installed but not used, according to a component manager; (10) the plan also does not identify needed resources and does not address Departmentwide problems with systems that are critical to the successful implementation of the TAV initiative; (11) the initiative's implementation problems have largely resulted from long-standing management issues that have hindered other major management initiatives; (12) these issues include cultural resistance to change, service parochialism, the lack of outcome-oriented goals and performance measures, and the lack of management accountability; (13) resistance to changing from reliance on just-in-case inventory approaches to reliance on just-in-time inventory is a significant challenge for DOD in its approach to inventory management; and (14) this new way of doing business requires timely and accurate information about quantities and location of items and a willingness by the item holders to transfer them to meet the priority needs of others.













From Warehouse to Warfighter


Book Description







DOD highrisk areas : eliminating underlying causes will avoid billions of dollars in waste


Book Description

This report discusses the (1) high-risk areas of financial management, information technology, weapon systems acquisition, contract management, infrastructure, and inventory management; (2) underlying causes of these high-risk areas; and (3) overall strategy we believe is needed to eliminate them.




DoD Implementation of the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993


Book Description

The Government Performance and Results Act (P.L. 103-62), the "GPRA" or "Results Act," was passed more than three years ago. The Department of Defense (DoD) has been engaged in its implementation. In reviewing the actions the department has taken thus far to meet GPRA requirements, I argue that the influence that performance budgeting concepts bring to bear has implications for the framework for the department's GPRA implementation, e.g., DoD's Planning, Programming, and Budgeting System (PPBS). I conclude that although DoD has strong planning and budgeting processes in place, significant implementation issues remain. Five issues are covered in the paper: the selection of appropriate measures; the process for performance planning/reporting; the desirability of changes to the accounting structure; the utility of increasing use of the Five Year Defense Program (FYDP) account structure to align performance with expenditures; and, the definition of the process for consulting with the Congress.