Haskins V. Stanton
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 92 pages
File Size : 47,93 MB
Release : 1986
Category :
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 92 pages
File Size : 47,93 MB
Release : 1986
Category :
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 120 pages
File Size : 12,83 MB
Release : 1964
Category :
ISBN :
50298
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 648 pages
File Size : 15,37 MB
Release : 2009
Category : Consumer protection
ISBN :
Author : Schwartz
Publisher : Wolters Kluwer
Page : 6176 pages
File Size : 48,68 MB
Release : 1997-01-01
Category : Law
ISBN : 0471117617
In this invaluable three-volume set, you'll get an analysis of every aspect of the statute from the plaintiffs' and defendants' side of the courtroom - from direction on potential to considerations about choice of forum. This reference also gives you citations to state and district court decisions and circuit-by-circuit breakdowns of leading decisions. Plus, you'll explore constitutional rights enforceable under Section 1983, every facet of municipal liability and qualified immunity, bifurcating claims against officers and municipalities, and more. Martin A. Schwartz, an expert of Section 1983 actions, goes a step further and provides positions on open issues. Also available as part of the Section 1983 Litigation Complete Six-Volume Set.
Author : Washington (State). Supreme Court
Publisher :
Page : 848 pages
File Size : 28,7 MB
Release : 1917
Category : Law reports, digests, etc
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 22 pages
File Size : 38,60 MB
Release : 1980
Category :
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher : BoD – Books on Demand
Page : 706 pages
File Size : 49,28 MB
Release :
Category :
ISBN : 3368721089
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 12 pages
File Size : 17,50 MB
Release : 1976
Category :
ISBN :
Author : Elizabeth I. Boals
Publisher : Aspen Publishing
Page : 142 pages
File Size : 32,42 MB
Release : 2016
Category : Law
ISBN : 160156581X
Stanton v. Armstrong is a civil action for defamation and tortious interference with contract with the extra glamor of a beauty pageant. Harper Stanton brought the action against Toby Armstrong in the United States District Court, District of Nita, for an allegedly defamatory statement claiming Stanton had taken a bribe to fix the Miss Olympia beauty pageant. Armstrong posted this statement on the Pageant Tips Blog. At the time of the blog post, Stanton was the Chief Executive Officer of Miss Olympia, Inc. and Armstrong was a blogger and the owner of a pageant contestant coaching company. Many facilities and technology malfunctions impacted the quality of the Miss Olympia Pageant that year: lighting and sound problems; a missing judge; changes in the scoring method. After the disastrous pageant, Miss Olympia, Inc. fired Stanton. Were Armstrong’s unfounded claims the basis for Stanton’s firing? Was Stanton legitimately fired for being a dishonest CEO manipulating the pageant from behind the scenes? Or was Stanton fired for tarnishing the Miss Olympia Pageant through no fault of his own? Stanton v. Armstrong is a civil action for defamation and tortious interference with contract with the extra glamor of a beauty pageant. Harper Stanton brought the action against Toby Armstrong in the United States District Court, District of Nita, for an allegedly defamatory statement claiming Stanton had taken a bribe to fix the Miss Olympia beauty pageant. Armstrong posted this statement on the Pageant Tips Blog. At the time of the blog post, Stanton was the Chief Executive Officer of Miss Olympia, Inc. and Armstrong was a blogger and the owner of a pageant contestant coaching company. Many facilities and technology malfunctions impacted the quality of the Miss Olympia Pageant that year: lighting and sound problems; a missing judge; changes in the scoring method. After the disastrous pageant, Miss Olympia, Inc. fired Stanton. Were Armstrong’s unfounded claims the basis for Stanton’s firing? Was Stanton legitimately fired for being a dishonest CEO manipulating the pageant from behind the scenes? Or was Stanton fired for tarnishing the Miss Olympia Pageant through no fault of his own? This entertaining case file supports all the alleged intrigue with exhibits that include blog posts, a Twitter account, and a YouTube video, all hosted on “microsites” specifically created for use in trial. Scoring sheets and pageant guidelines, photographs, room sketches, and more provide a wealth of information for students to analyze when deciding what to pursue in both depositions and the full trial.
Author : United States. Department of the Interior
Publisher :
Page : 646 pages
File Size : 26,3 MB
Release : 1894
Category : Public lands
ISBN :