Impact of the OECD Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting on the Taxation of Fiscally Transparent Entities Under the Australia - UK Double Tax Agreement


Book Description

This article examines the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (MLI) in relation to fiscally transparent entities; specifically limited partnerships which are taxed as flow-through entities in one jurisdiction but as companies in another. Focusing on the adoption positions of Australia and the UK, this article analyses how the MLI impacts the treatment of fiscally transparent entities under the Australia-UK Double Tax Agreement. To add practical perspective, the article further examines the Australian decision in Commissioner of Taxation v Resource Capital Fund III LP, which raises a number of important issues embodied in the MLI concerning the application of principles in the 1999 OECD Partnership Report and the mutual agreement procedure (MAP) for resolving treaty-related disputes in Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention. Whilst acknowledging the immense achievement of the OECD and the ad hoc Group in securing international consensus in relation to the multifarious MLI, nevertheless the article concludes the MLI is unlikely to achieve its primary objective to improve predictability and certainty for governments and businesses notwithstanding the option of 'mandatory binding arbitration'.




OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Australia (Stage 1) Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 14


Book Description

Under Action 14, countries have committed to implement a minimum standard to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The MAP is included in Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention and commits countries to endeavour to resolve disputes related to ...




OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project Preventing the Granting of Treaty Benefits in Inappropriate Circumstances


Book Description

This report from the OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting project examines the issue of preventing the granting of treaty benefits in inappropriate circumstances. It includes proposed changes to the OECD Model Tax convention and summarises progress to date.







OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project Developing a Multilateral Instrument to Modify Bilateral Tax Treaties, Action 15 - 2015 Final Report


Book Description

Addressing base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) is a key priority of governments. In 2013, OECD and G20 countries, working together on an equal footing, adopted a 15-point Action Plan to address BEPS. This publication is the final report for Action 15.




Explanatory Statement to the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting


Book Description

The Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (the Convention) is one of the outcomes of the OECD/G20 Project to tackle base erosion and profit shifting (the BEPS Project) i.e. tax planning strategies that exploit gaps and mismatches in tax rules to artificially shift profits to low or no-tax locations where there is little or no economic activity, resulting in little or no overall corporate tax being paid. The BEPS Action Plan was developed by the OECD Committee on Fiscal Affairs (CFA) and endorsed by the G20 Leaders in September 2013. It identified 15 actions to address base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) in a comprehensive manner, and set out deadlines to implement those actions. Action 15 of the BEPS Action Plan provided for an analysis of the possible development of a multilateral instrument to implement tax treaty related BEPS measures "to enable jurisdictions that wish to do so to implement measures developed in the course of the work on BEPS and amend bilateral tax treaties". The Action 15 Report, "Developing a Multilateral Instrument to Modify Bilateral Tax Treaties", concluded that a multilateral instrument, providing an innovative approach to enable countries to swiftly modify their bilateral tax treaties to implement measures developed in the course of the work on BEPS, is desirable and feasible, and that negotiations for such an instrument should be convened quickly.




OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, New Zealand (Stage 1) Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 14


Book Description

Under Action 14, countries have committed to implement a minimum standard to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The MAP is included in Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention and commits countries to endeavour to resolve disputes related to ...




OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project Prevention of Tax Treaty Abuse – Sixth Peer Review Report on Treaty Shopping Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 6


Book Description

Under the BEPS Action 6 minimum standard on treaty shopping, members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS have committed to strengthen their tax treaties by implementing anti-abuse measures. This report reflects the outcome of the sixth peer review of the implementation of the BEPS Action 6 minimum standard on treaty shopping.




Classifying Entities and the Meaning of 'Tax Transparency'


Book Description

Imposing UK tax on an entity or those linked to it involves understanding what kind of entity is being dealt with, especially when it is formed outside the UK. Is it a company, a partnership, a trust or something else? This often involves considering whether the entity is ‘tax transparent’ and if so, what that means. While of great importance, the UK tax rules for classifying entities are notoriously vague, as is the UK meaning of ‘tax transparency’. This book breaks new ground by exploring these topics comprehensively, in a world which is well aware of the problems created by entity classification mismatches. In so doing, it addresses, with emphasis on UK tax law, issues such as: the meaning of a ‘partnership’ and a ‘trust’; what is meant and is not meant by ‘tax transparency’, across a range of taxes and situations; how tax treaties have dealt with entity classification questions and related ‘transparency’ issues; how entity classification questions are impacted by EU law; and how the UK approach could be improved, policy-wise and practically, without facilitating tax avoidance. The book compares in detail the UK entity classification approach with that of the US, the Netherlands and France. Appendices consider the unusual UK capital gains tax treatment of partnerships, as well as the special transparency rules which can apply where a partnership is party to loans or derivative contracts, or owns intangible assets. Questions of entity classification and tax transparency are of fundamental importance in any mature tax system and especially in a globalised economy. This book unlocks those questions for both academics and practitioners.




OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Denmark (Stage 1) Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 14


Book Description

This report reflects the outcome of the stage 1 peer review of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by the Czech Republic, which is accompanied by a document addressing the implementation of best practices which can be accessed on the OECD website.