Implementation of the 1996 Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments and Funding of State Drinking Water Programs


Book Description

Implementation of the 1996 Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments and funding of state drinking water programs : hearing before the Subcommittee on Health and Environment of the Committee on Commerce, House of Representatives, One Hundred Sixth Congress, second session, September 19, 2000.




Drinking Water


Book Description

States play a key role in ensuring compliance with the require. of the Safe Drinking Water Act. This report assesses the amounts of fund. avail. and expended for implementing the states' drinking water prog. (DWP). Provides info. on: how EPA's budget requests for the states' implementation of their DWP compare with the amounts authorized and estimated to be needed; how much the states have spent since the passage of the 1996 amend. to implement these DWP and how the expend. compare with the estimated needs; the states' ability to implement their DWP; and what practices have the potential to help the states implement their DWP more effectively and efficiently.







Drinking Water


Book Description







Safe Drinking Water Act and Its Interpretation


Book Description

Key drinking water issues include problems caused by specific contaminants, such as the gasoline additive methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), perchlorate, and lead, as well as the related issue of the appropriate federal role in providing financial assistance for water infrastructure projects. Congress last reauthorised the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) in 1996, and although funding authority for most SDWA programs expired in FY2003, broad reauthorization efforts are not expected as EPA, states, and water utilities remain busy implementing the requirements of the 1996 amendments. Concerns about perchlorate in drinking water also have returned to the congressional agenda, after the past Congress enacted several provisions on this issue. H.R. 213 has been introduced to require EPA to set a drinking water standard for perchlorate in 2007, and a January 2005 National Academy of Sciences report on the health effects of perchlorate has increased oversight interest in perchlorate regulatory activities at EPA. Concerns over the security of the nation's drinking water supplies were addressed by the 107th Congress through the Bioterrorism Preparedness Act (P.L. 107-188), which amended SDWA to require community water systems to conduct vulnerability assessments and prepare emergency response plans. Subsequent congressional action has involved oversight and funding of water security assessment and planning efforts and research. An ongoing SDWA issue involves the growing cost and complexity of drinking water standards and the ability of water systems, especially small, rural systems, to comply with standards. The issue of the cost of drinking water standards, particularly the new arsenic standard, has merged with the larger debate over the federal role in assisting communities with financing drinking water infrastructure - an issue that has become more challenging in a time of tightened budgets. Congress authorized a drinking water state revolving fund (DWSRF) program in 1996 to help communities finance projects needed to meet standards. For FY2005, Congress provided $843 million for the DWSRF program, and the President has requested $850 million for FY2006. Notwithstanding this program, studies show that a large funding gap exists and will grow as SDWA requirements increase and infrastructure ages.







Safe Drinking Water Act


Book Description