Improving Remedial Middle School Standardized Test Scores


Book Description

The purpose of this applied study was to solve the problem of low standardized test scores in a remedial class for a middle school in southern Virginia and to formulate a solution to address the problem. The central research question that data collection attempted to answer was: How can the problem of low standardized test scores in a remedial math class be solved in a middle school in southern Virginia? Data were collected in three ways. First, interviews of teachers and administrators of the remedial math class, called Math Lab, were conducted. These interviews were transcribed and coded, with the codes collected into themes and then displayed visually. Second, an online discussion board was conducted with current and former teachers of Math Lab, school administrators, and classroom math teachers. Third, surveys of teachers and administrators with knowledge of Math Lab and how it impacted students were completed. The quantitative surveys were analyzed by finding descriptive statistics of the data. After reviewing all data sources, a solution to address the problem was created that included designing a curriculum for Math Lab, requiring communication between Math Lab teachers and general classroom math teachers, and professional development of the Math Lab teacher about teaching remedial classes.




The Answers


Book Description

Nationally acclaimed school principal and education consultant Dr. Ron Kelley provides information for educators and parents regarding how to increase scores on standardized tests and improve discipline management in schools




Driven by Data


Book Description

Offers a practical guide for improving schools dramatically that will enable all students from all backgrounds to achieve at high levels. Includes assessment forms, an index, and a DVD.




Raising Test Scores for All Students


Book Description

Finally—a school improvement plan that raises standardized test scores and improves your students′ performance! Standardized tests are so widely used in public schools, they seem to have been around forever. On the contrary, standardized testing as we know it today is a relatively recent phenomenon, and in today′s classrooms and schools the stakes have never been higher. For students, test results may determine whether they are promoted from one grade to another or if they receive their high school diplomas. For teachers, the pressures are equally great. Student outcomes on standardized tests are often directly linked to annual evaluations, pay raises, and even future employment. And for school administrators, these tests can determine the reputation of a school and be the basis for public rewards or demoralizing sanctions. Raising Test Scores for All Students marries knowledge about testing and test preparation with school improvement, providing a comprehensive guide for administrators looking for a systemic approach to the challenge of standardized testing. Eugene Kennedy includes a concise overview of the history and research on testing, case studies, flow charts and forms, as well as a four-step approach to improving performance: Step 1: Adopting a Systemic Approach to Improvement and Change Step 2: Aligning the Educational Process with the Desired Outcome Step 3: Aligning the Education Process with Inputs Step 4: Creating Positive Change . . . Plus strategies and techniques for motivating all your students. This innovative approach is an invaluable tool for any educator!




Improving Proficiency with Online Learning


Book Description

The problem addressed in this dissertation is the low mathematics scores on state tests that leads to school districts having difficulty meeting overall student achievement requirements for accreditation purposes. The purpose of this study was to compare the progress on an interim common assessment of students who were enrolled in a MATH 180 remedial online course with the progress of those who were not enrolled in the course at a Midwest, suburban middle school. This dissertation was a culmination of research that involved the collection of quantitative data to measure the potential outcomes of one treatment. Three specific categories of students were identified to compare to the control group: gender, race, and socioeconomic status. If the data collected were found to be significant, online learning may serve as an asset for school districts struggling to maintain their accreditation. Further, a new approach that moved students along the continuum of learning at a faster pact than the traditional methods would also be beneficial not only for accreditation purposes but also for student success. The data collected were found to be inconclusive in two areas regarding the program's effectiveness to improve students' proficiency levels. Neither gender nor socioeconomic status (as measured by free/reduced lunch status) showed any significant difference from the general population; however, when considering race, Hispanic students did generate a mean score growth higher than those in the control group, indicating the program did have positive effects in this area. While online learning may prove to be an asset for school districts struggling to maintain their accreditation, and in this dissertation proved to be an asset for Hispanic students, the data ultimately did not support that being true for the intervention, MATH 180, with respect to gender and socioeconomic status in the school of study. Future studies may consider implementing other online learning platforms to support student learning as well as extending the duration of the study and the scope of the participants.




Standardized Testing


Book Description

This quantitative study emphasizes the effectiveness of a middle school learning environment on the Georgia Standardized Assessment (Georgia Milestone Assessment System - GMAS) in the subject of Math. The purpose of this quantitative study is to determine whether there is a difference in the 8th grade Math Georgia Milestone standardized testing scores (adjusted by the covariate) within the three types of middle schools: STEM, magnet and traditional middle schools. This quantitative research study compares the student achievement data of a large urban school system’s STEM school to those of a traditional middle school and magnet middle school in the subject of math in the progression from 7th to 8th grades. Approximately 200+ students’ scores from each school will be compared using an ANCOVA to determine the gains in Math. The results of the study showed that there was a significant difference in Math GMAS scores between traditional and STEM middle schools. There were no significant differences in Math GMAS scores between traditional and magnet middle schools or STEM and magnet middle schools. The STEM middle school was shown to have a higher increase in the GMAS Math standardized test scores over the two-year period than the other two types of schools. The results encourage the idea that STEM schools are more effective in teaching in the area of Math when compared to the other local middle schools. By utilizing similar teaching techniques, every student in every middle school can have the same learning experience.







The Case Against Standardized Testing


Book Description

Kohn's central message is that standardized tests are "not a force of nature but a force of politics--and political decisions can be questioned, challenged, and ultimately reversed."




Using Data to Improve Student Learning in Middle School


Book Description

This book helps you make sense of the data your school collects, including state student achievement results as well as other qualitative and quantitative data. Easy-to-use templates, tools, and examples are available on the accompanying downloadable resources.




A Passion for Proof


Book Description