Independent Research and Development


Book Description







Independent Research and Development


Book Description




Independent Research and Development


Book Description







Bridges to Independence


Book Description

A rising median age at which PhD's receive their first research grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is among the factors forcing academic biomedical researchers to spend longer periods of time before they can set their own research directions and establish there independence. The fear that promising prospective scientists will choose other career paths has raised concerns about the future of biomedical research in the United States. At the request of NIH, the National Academies conducted a study on ways to address these issues. The report recommends that NIH make fostering independence of biomedical researchers an agencywide goal, and that it take steps to provide postdocs and early-career investigators with more financial support for their own research, improve postdoc mentoring and establish programs for new investigators and staff scientists among other mechanisms.




The Defense Department's Support of Industry's Independent Research and Development (IR&D)


Book Description

In 1986, Congress requested an independent evaluation of Department of Defense (DoD) policies toward independent research and development (IR & D). RAND was ask to undertake a study that would 1) clarify the goals of IR & D (explain how DoD support of IR & D can serve the national interest); 2) assess whether certain DoD administrative and financial arrangements promote or thwart the goals of IR & D; and 3) evaluate the IR & D process overall, determining to what extent it contributes distinctively to U.S. national defense. This report examined the benefits and costs of DoD support of IR & D, how to administer such a program and recommendations. Topics include: Cost recovery allocations; Accountability for public funds; Incentives.




How DoD Policy Affects Private Expenditure on Independent Research and Development


Book Description

The Department of Defense (DOD) maintains a policy that is designed to reimburse defense contractors for a portion of their spending on Independent Research and Development (IR & D). DOD pays for a great deal of research and development directly through contracts. IR & D is research and development that DOD does not contract for directly. IR & D policy is designed to encourage defense contractors to invest in this form of research and development despite the lack of direct contracts for research and development. It is often associated with Bid and Proposal (B & P) funds, which DOD provides to contractors in a similar way. Those who support maintaining the independence of IR & D argue that it increases private spending on defense research and development, provides defense options that government officials may not think of, and enhances the transfer of technology from scientists to weapons developers by giving developers a direct stake in the scientists' work. Section II presents a simple economic model of IR & D. Section III uses this model to review the economic approach taken in each study. Section IV compares the studies' estimates of the size of subsidy created by IR & D policy and the effects of IR & D policy on private spending on IR & D. Section V concludes the comparison and suggests directions for future research.