Index of the Decisions of the Supreme Court of Mauritius
Author : Mauritius. Supreme Court
Publisher :
Page : 134 pages
File Size : 23,56 MB
Release : 1879
Category : Law reports, digests, etc
ISBN :
Author : Mauritius. Supreme Court
Publisher :
Page : 134 pages
File Size : 23,56 MB
Release : 1879
Category : Law reports, digests, etc
ISBN :
Author : Mauritius. Supreme Court
Publisher :
Page : 72 pages
File Size : 48,52 MB
Release : 1905
Category : Law reports, digests, etc
ISBN :
Author : World Bank
Publisher : World Bank Publications
Page : 241 pages
File Size : 39,22 MB
Release : 2019-11-21
Category : Business & Economics
ISBN : 1464814414
Seventeen in a series of annual reports comparing business regulation in 190 economies, Doing Business 2020 measures aspects of regulation affecting 10 areas of everyday business activity.
Author : Library of Congress. African Section
Publisher :
Page : 76 pages
File Size : 48,45 MB
Release : 1965
Category : Comoros
ISBN :
Author : United Nations Environment Programme
Publisher : UNEP/Earthprint
Page : 282 pages
File Size : 13,18 MB
Release : 2005
Category : Law
ISBN : 9280725572
Success in tackling environmental degradation relies on the full participation of everyone in society. The judiciary is a crucial partner in promoting environmental governance, upholding the rule of law and in ensuring a fair balance between environmental, social and developmental considerations through its judgements and declarations. This publication outlines the work done by UNEP in cooperation with several partners in developing and implementing a programme to engage the judiciaries of all countries in the pursuit of the rule of law in the area of environment and sustainable development.
Author : State Library of Iowa
Publisher :
Page : 1238 pages
File Size : 23,59 MB
Release : 1866
Category :
ISBN :
Report for 1871/1873-1903/1905 contains a list of additions to the miscellaneous and law departments.
Author : Charles C. Soule
Publisher :
Page : 520 pages
File Size : 43,85 MB
Release : 1883
Category : Annotations and citations (Law)
ISBN :
Author : Iowa
Publisher :
Page : 666 pages
File Size : 30,58 MB
Release : 1882
Category : Iowa
ISBN :
Contains the reports of state departments and officials for the preceding fiscal biennium.
Author : Iowa. General Assembly
Publisher :
Page : 682 pages
File Size : 17,68 MB
Release : 1882
Category : Iowa
ISBN :
Contains the reports of state departments and officials for the preceding fiscal biennium.
Author : Andrew Coan
Publisher : Harvard University Press
Page : 281 pages
File Size : 21,36 MB
Release : 2019-04-29
Category : Law
ISBN : 0674986954
In this groundbreaking analysis of Supreme Court decision-making, Andrew Coan explains how judicial caseload shapes the course of American constitutional law and the role of the Court in American society. Compared with the vast machinery surrounding Congress and the president, the Supreme Court is a tiny institution that can resolve only a small fraction of the constitutional issues that arise in any given year. Rationing the Constitution shows that this simple yet frequently ignored fact is essential to understanding how the Supreme Court makes constitutional law. Due to the structural organization of the judiciary and certain widely shared professional norms, the capacity of the Supreme Court to review lower-court decisions is severely limited. From this fact, Andrew Coan develops a novel and arresting theory of Supreme Court decision-making. In deciding cases, the Court must not invite more litigation than it can handle. On many of the most important constitutional questions—touching on federalism, the separation of powers, and individual rights—this constraint creates a strong pressure to adopt hard-edged categorical rules, or defer to the political process, or both. The implications for U.S. constitutional law are profound. Lawyers, academics, and social activists pursuing social reform through the courts must consider whether their goals can be accomplished within the constraints of judicial capacity. Often the answer will be no. The limits of judicial capacity also substantially constrain the Court’s much touted—and frequently lamented—power to overrule democratic majorities. As Rationing the Constitution demonstrates, the Supreme Court is David, not Goliath.