Murder at the Supreme Court


Book Description

Offers a unique behind the scenes look at the capital punishment cases that made it to the highest court in the land.




Rush to Judgment


Book Description

The push to convict Ed Clark of two murders included illegal eavesdropping, withheld and altered documents, and jury tampering. It could happen to you...




The Case of Sacco and Vanzetti


Book Description

On April 15, 1920, Parmenter, a paymaster, and Berardelli, his guard, were fired upon and killed. Sacco and Vanzetti were charged on May 5, 1920, with the crime of the murders, were indicted on September 14, 1920, and put to trial May 31, 1921, at Dedham, Norfolk County, Massachusetts. compare pages [3]-8.




Lying in Judgment


Book Description

A man serves on the jury of a murder trial — for the crime that he committed. Peter Robertson, 33, discovers his wife is cheating on him. Following her suspected boyfriend one night, he erupts into a rage, beats him and leaves him to die… or so he thought. Soon he discovers that he has killed the wrong man – a perfect stranger. Six months later, impaneled on a jury, he realizes that the murder being tried is the one he committed. After wrestling with his conscience, he works hard to convince the jury to acquit the accused man. But the prosecution’s case is strong as the accused man had both motive and opportunity to commit the murder. As the pressure builds, Peter begins to slip up and reveal things that only the murderer would know – and Christine, a pretty and intelligent alternate juror, suspects something is amiss. Meanwhile, Peter’s wife leaves him, his mother suffers a series of debilitating strokes, and his best friend and employee, accused of sexual harassment, needs Peter’s help that he’s too preoccupied to give. As jurors one by one declare their intention to convict, Peter’s conscience eats away at him and he careens toward nervous breakdown, revealing details about the crime that had not been disclosed in court. Lying in Judgment is a gripping courtroom thriller about a good man’s search for redemption for his tragic, fatal mistake, pitted against society’s search for justice.







Famous Murder Trials


Book Description




Juror 11


Book Description

BALANCING THE SCALES OF JUSTICEInnocent Until Proven Guilty?Juror 11 will take you on a journey into a courtroom where you will take your place in one of the 12 chairs located in the jury panel box. While you are seated in your leather chair, you will hear the details of a murder trial. When you've heard all the evidence submitted in this case, you have the chance to determine the guilt or innocence of the man on trial by going to our website, www.juror11.com. There you will find a verdict form that will allow you to assign guilt or innocence of the defendant, who has been charged with 6 felony crimes.After you have communicated your verdict, your suspense filled journey will continue into the deliberation room where the actual trial discussions will be revealed to you as the jurors attempted to balance truth and impartiality. You'll discover shocking reasons why some jurors want to tip the scales of justice, even if it means shying away from the evidence.IT WILL LEAVE YOU ASKING: WHO JUDGES THE JUDGE




How to Try a Murder


Book Description

Whether you are an armchair attorney or a murder maven, this book gives everything you need to prosecute, defend, render a verdict, and pronounce sentence on the trial of the moment.




Death Penalty Cases


Book Description

Death Penalty Cases presents significant verbatim excerpts of death-penalty decisions from the United States Supreme Court. The first chapter introduces the topics discussed throughout the book. It also includes a detailed history of the death penalty in the United States. After this introduction, the remaining eighteen chapters are divided into five parts: Foundational Cases, Death-Eligible Crimes and Persons, The Death Penalty Trial, Post-Conviction Review, and Execution Issues. The first part, consisting of five chapters, talks about the mandatory death penalty, mitigating evidence and racial bias. The next part covers death-eligible crimes, such as rape and other crimes that do not involve homicide and murder. The middle part presents the trial process, from choosing the appropriate decision-makers through the sentencing decision. Followed by this is a chapter focusing on the aftermath of conviction, such as claims of innocence. The book concludes by exploring issues related to execution, such as not executing insane convicts. Finally, execution methods are presented. Provides the most recent case material--no need to supplement Topical organization of cases provides a more logical organization for structuring a course Co-authors with different perspectives on the death penalty assures complete impartiality of the material Provides the necessary historical background, a clear explanation of the current capital case process, and an impartial description of the controversies surrounding the death penalty Provides the latest statistics relevant to discussions on the death penalty Clearly explains the different ways in which the states process death penalty cases, with excerpts of the most relevant statutes




We, the Jury


Book Description

We, the Jury is the dramatic story of seven jurors, who convicted Scott Peterson of murdering his wife, Laci, and their unborn son, Conner, despite a series of internal battles that brought the first major murder trial of the 21st century to the brink of a mistrial. The Peterson jurors argued and disagreed but eventually bonded to seal the fate of the icy killer who dumped his victims into the bullet-gray waters of San Francisco Bay. The seven jurors of We, the Jury were seven average Americans who never imagined the horrors they would face or the phantoms that would haunt them after they convicted the enigmatic murderer and recommended that he be put to death. This is the story of how the American jury system worked after being battered by critics for the way it functioned in the trials of O.J. Simpson and Michael Jackson. Unlike the jurors in those trials, who second-guessed themselves, the Peterson jurors do not question their decisions. It wasn’t one thing that condemned Scott Peterson, it was everything.