Knowledge, Attitudes, and Instructional Practices of Michigan Community College Math Instructors


Book Description

Numerous efforts in math education have attempted to convince instructors to shift their instructional practices from lecture to alternative student-centered practices, but these have not been successful on a large scale, despite professional development that focuses on increasing awarness and improving instructor attitudes about student-centered instructional practices. This may be due to a knowledge-attitude-practice gap (KAP Gap), which exists when knowledge and favorable attitude do not lead toward adoption of a practice. This study uses a quantitative approach (author-created electronic survey, response rate 21.2%) to measure knowledge, attitudes, and instructional practices of Michigan community college mathematics faculty, with the purpose of identifying the existence of a possible KAP Gap and the factors that might be influencing its existence. The analysis includes a breakdown about how community college math faculty acquire their knowledge of instructional practices and their level of participation in a variety of formal and non-formal professional development activities. General faculty attitudes about teaching and the teaching environment are measured using survey instruments developed by Trigwell and Prosser (2004,2008). Attitudes towards three instructional practices (collaborative learning, inquiry-based learning, and the lecture method) are examined in depth, especially with regard to the influence of the environment, the enabling characteristics of students, and the time requirements for using the method. Finally, instructors are asked to report about their level of use of each of the three practices (allowing the use of more than one practice) using a scale developed by Henderson & Dancy (2009). This study is one of the first to directly identify a KAP Gap for instructional practices in mathematics and to explore the variables that influence the instructional practices of college math instructors. The results suggest that knowledge plus a favorable instructor attitude is not enough to predict an instructor's use of a student-centered instructional practice (although an unfavorable attitude will predict non-use). This study also illuminated significant difference between adjunct and full-time faculty in the level of professional engagement, breadth of teaching experiences, and use of student-centered instructional practices.




Beliefs and Practices


Book Description










Inside the Community College Developmental Math Classroom


Book Description

This study provides a better understanding of how student and faculty perceive the developmental math classroom experience and the impact on students’ ability to successfully complete developmental math courses. A significant contribution of the study is the identification of a positive correlation between students’ attitudes and perceptions of the classroom environment and successful course completion. A second major contribution is a detailed description of pedagogical strategies and classroom leadership behaviors exhibited by developmental math faculty who do, and do not, have high student pass rates. The three research questions for this study were: 1. What is the relationship between students’ attitudes and perceptions of their developmental math classroom experience and their likelihood for successful course completion? 2. To what extent are student and faculty attitudes and perceptions of the developmental math classroom learning environment congruent? 3. What are the pedagogical strategies and classroom leadership behaviors exhibited by developmental math faculty who do, and do not, have high student pass rates in these courses? Two theoretical frameworks; Goal Theory Model of Achievement Motivation and Transformational Leadership; were used to guide this research. This mixed methods study was a case study of developmental math students and faculty from a medium sized rural community college in Texas, enrolled and teaching in the fall 2013. The sample included 661students enrolled in developmental math during the fall 2013 semester. There were a total of 17 developmental math instructors, of which three were employed full time, and 14 were employed part time. Quantitative data was collected from all 17 faculty and seven of these faculty were interviewed about the instructional practices they use when teaching developmental math students. A quantitative analysis was conducted of secondary course evaluation and student success data. A factor analysis was first conducted and reliability established for the course evaluation data. Next, a Pearson product moment r correlation was conducted in to determine the correlation between student perception and student success rates. The qualitative methods employed included 7 interviews (2 full time and 5 part time) with recruited developmental math faculty. Transcribed interview data were organized by thematic data analysis using a deductive process (Creswell, 2008) The Pearson product-moment r correlation conducted in this study found moderate positive correlations, r(14) = .64, p










Annual Meeting Program


Book Description







Beliefs and Instructional Practices of Four Community College Remedial Mathematics Instructors


Book Description

In an extension of research linking teachers' beliefs about mathematics and their instructional practices at the PreK-12 level, the present study examined and documented both the beliefs and instructional practices of four community college instructors who teach remedial mathematics. Data was collected through survey, observations, interviews and classroom artifacts.