Congressional Record


Book Description




Journal of the House of Representatives of the United States


Book Description

Some vols. include supplemental journals of "such proceedings of the sessions, as, during the time they were depending, were ordered to be kept secret, and respecting which the injunction of secrecy was afterwards taken off by the order of the House."







Letter from the Secretary of War Transmitting a Letter from the Chief of Engineers, United States Army, Dated April 17, 1946, Submitting a Report, Together with Accompanying Papers and an Illustration, on a Review of Report on the Mississippi River Between Coon Rapids Dam and the Mouth of the Ohio River, with a View to Providing Flood Protection in the Reach Between the Mouth of Kaskaskia River and the Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage and Levee District with Particular Reference to the Town of Prairie Du Rocher in Randolph County, Ill., Requested by a Resolution of the Committee on Flood Control, House of Representatives, Adopted on September 18, 1944


Book Description







River of History


Book Description




Engineers Far from Ordinary


Book Description

Includes full color maps and photographs.




Trust in Numbers


Book Description

A foundational work on historical and social studies of quantification What accounts for the prestige of quantitative methods? The usual answer is that quantification is desirable in social investigation as a result of its successes in science. Trust in Numbers questions whether such success in the study of stars, molecules, or cells should be an attractive model for research on human societies, and examines why the natural sciences are highly quantitative in the first place. Theodore Porter argues that a better understanding of the attractions of quantification in business, government, and social research brings a fresh perspective to its role in psychology, physics, and medicine. Quantitative rigor is not inherent in science but arises from political and social pressures, and objectivity derives its impetus from cultural contexts. In a new preface, the author sheds light on the current infatuation with quantitative methods, particularly at the intersection of science and bureaucracy.