Maneuver Control System


Book Description

The U.S. Army's Maneuver Control System (MCS) has been under development for a third of the century but has failed to meet the command and control needs of field units. Of the five command and control programs that are part of the Army Tactical Command and Control System (ATCCS), MCS is the least mature and the least accepted program, yet it is the most important because MCS provides the means for all levels of command to share a Command picture of the battlefield. The software acquisition strategy, government and contractor organizations, and technical approach are identified as the key areas in need of improvement. The Army's paradigm for developing command and control systems has to change. Software prototypes have to be fielded every nine months. The government and contractor organizations should emphasize horizontal rather than vertical integration. The technical approach must be achievable within the constraints of existing low capacity communications systems and software updates should be consistent with a target technical architecture. The Program Executive Officer for Command and Control Systems and the Director of Information Systems for Command, Control, Communications, and Computers (DISC4) have the authority to make the recommended changes. The issue is whether the management focus will remain on the five individual ATCCS systems, or come to recognize ATCCS as a "system of systems."




Training Field Grade Officers to Exploit the Maneuver Control System


Book Description

As the U.S. Army transforms itself for future information age operations, it will rely heavily on the Army Battlefield Command Systems (ABCS) to provide digital Command and Control (C2) support to commanders throughout the theater of operations. ABCS is designed to provide the vertical and horizontal data flow required to achieve rapid decision-making and execution speeds needed to gain and retain informational dominance throughout future operations. As described in this monograph, the Maneuver Control System (MCS) provides this vertical and horizontal integration as a member of the Army Tactical Command and Control System (ATCCS), the middle layer of systems in the ABCS architecture. ABCS has the capability to provide the C2 support required by future commanders. At issue is whether the U.S. Army will train its leaders to exploit the provided technology, specifically the MCS. This monograph defines exploitation of technology (i.e., understanding its capabilities, recognizing its opportunities, and acting to multiply the affects of those capabilities); and provides reasons why it is necessary to train Army leaders to exploit technology, not just to use technology. ABCS use clearly improves C2 efficiency. ABCS exploitation combines and optimizes the strengths of decision-makers and systems to achieve even better and faster use of the technology. The focus of this monograph is, therefore, on the decision-maker/MCS interface, the point where exploitation of technology must occur in order to retain the technological initiative.







Tactical Computers


Book Description







Warfighting


Book Description

The manual describes the general strategy for the U.S. Marines but it is beneficial for not only every Marine to read but concepts on leadership can be gathered to lead a business to a family. If you want to see what make Marines so effective this book is a good place to start.




Battlefield Automation


Book Description




Battlefield Automation


Book Description

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed weaknesses in the Army's efforts to develop segments of its Tactical Command and Control System, focusing on the: (1) All Source Analysis System; (2) Maneuver Control System; and (3) Common Hardware and Software. GAO found that: (1) the Army plans to develop a limited All Source Analysis System with the minimum set of features that users need and add features as it develops other versions; (2) the reduced Soviet threat and the availability of existing capabilities similar to the All Source Analysis System have eliminated the need for further procurement of the limited system; (3) although All Source Analysis System equipment can be used to help refine software and system requirements, the Army's unapproved test plan calls for software that does not meet user requirements; (4) the Army spent $155 million to acquire Maneuver Control System equipment that does not meet its requirements; (5) the Army is rushing the Maneuver Control System's development and acquisition process to make a production decision and acquire equipment at the end of fiscal year 1992, even though the revised test and evaluation master plan is not approved and the operational test criteria are not adequately defined; and (6) although the Army cited several reasons to justify acquiring larger, transportable Common Hardware and Software computers and requiring many users that only need the less expensive, portable versions to buy the larger units, the disparity between the $340 million increase in acquisition costs and the logistical and hardware savings, as well as other benefits, does not support the Army's position.




Battlefield Automation: Software Problems Hinder Development of the Army's Maneuver Control System


Book Description

The Army has spent over $765 million of the $1 billion estimated total cost for the Maneuver Control System (MCS) which is to provide battlefield information to maneuver commanders. Since 1980, the MCS program has experienced numerous problems, such as fielding inadequate computer software and canceling the development of one software version due to design flaws, cost growth, and schedule slips. Given the program's past difficulties and the important role of MCS in the Army's battlefleld automation efforts, we reviewed the Army's development and acquisition plans for MCS. Specifically, our objectives were to determine whether (1) the current MCS software development strategy is appropriate to overcome prior development problems and (2) 207 new computers for MCS related training should be procured as planned.