Medicare


Book Description

In 1986, the Congress prohibited health maintenance organizations (HMOs) with Medicare risk contracts from using payments to directly or indirectly influence physicians to reduce or limit medical services to Medicare HMO enrollees. The ban is effective April 1, 1990. As requested by the Subcommittee on Health, GAO reviewed 19 HMO physician incentive plans and identified four characteristics that have the greatest potential to threaten quality of care for Medicare patients. These are: -The amount of risk shifted from the HMO to physicians. -The number of physicians whose cost performance is used to decide the size of the incentive pool available for distribution. -Whether incentive payments were based on a percentage of HMO savings or profits, and -The length of time over which cost performance is measured. Essentially, the troubling nature of these characteristics revolves around two key issues: 1) The immediacy of the linkage between a physician's treatment decision and payment of an incentive and 2) The amount of risk transferred from the HMO to the physician.




Medicare


Book Description

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) is an independent agency that works for Congress. The GAO watches over Congress, and investigates how the federal government spends taxpayers dollars. The Comptroller General of the United States is the leader of the GAO, and is appointed to a 15-year term by the U.S. President. The GAO wants to support Congress, while at the same time doing right by the citizens of the United States. They audit, investigate, perform analyses, issue legal decisions and report anything that the government is doing. This is one of their reports.




Medicare


Book Description




Medicare


Book Description




Medicare. Physician Incentive Payments by Hospitals Could Lead to Abuse


Book Description

During the past year, two physician incentive plans offered by hospitals have come under investigation for possible violation of Medicare law, one by the Department of Justice and the other by the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Inspector General. These two cases have raised questions about the adequacy of the Medicare statute to deter abuses that may arise under the incentives of the Medicare prospective payment system for hospitals. At the request of the Chairman, Subcommittee on Health, House Committee on Ways and Means, GAO obtained information on existing and proposed physician incentive plans and analyzed the plans to assess their legality under current law and determine the potential abuses that could arise under them in view of the changed incentives under prospective payment. This report discusses operational and proposed incentive plans offered to physicians by hospitals and the features of such plans that could increase the risk of them having detrimental effects on quality of care for Medicare patients suggeswted are possible modifications to Medicare law that might deter physician incentive plans from providing too strong an incentive to undertreat patients.




Geographic Adjustment in Medicare Payment


Book Description

Medicare, the world's single largest health insurance program, covers more than 47 million Americans. Although it is a national program, it adjusts payments to hospitals and health care practitioners according to the geographic location in which they provide service, acknowledging that the cost of doing business varies around the country. Under the adjustment systems, payments in high-cost areas are increased relative to the national average, and payments in low-cost areas are reduced. In July 2010, the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees Medicare, commissioned the IOM to conduct a two-part study to recommend corrections of inaccuracies and inequities in geographic adjustments to Medicare payments. The first report examined the data sources and methods used to adjust payments, and recommended a number of changes. Geographic Adjustment in Medicare Payment - Phase II:Implications for Access, Quality, and Efficiency applies the first report's recommendations in order to determine their potential effect on Medicare payments to hospitals and clinical practitioners. This report also offers recommendations to improve access to efficient and appropriate levels of care. Geographic Adjustment in Medicare Payment - Phase II:Implications for Access, Quality, and Efficiency expresses the importance of ensuring the availability of a sufficient health care workforce to serve all beneficiaries, regardless of where they live.




Care Without Coverage


Book Description

Many Americans believe that people who lack health insurance somehow get the care they really need. Care Without Coverage examines the real consequences for adults who lack health insurance. The study presents findings in the areas of prevention and screening, cancer, chronic illness, hospital-based care, and general health status. The committee looked at the consequences of being uninsured for people suffering from cancer, diabetes, HIV infection and AIDS, heart and kidney disease, mental illness, traumatic injuries, and heart attacks. It focused on the roughly 30 million-one in seven-working-age Americans without health insurance. This group does not include the population over 65 that is covered by Medicare or the nearly 10 million children who are uninsured in this country. The main findings of the report are that working-age Americans without health insurance are more likely to receive too little medical care and receive it too late; be sicker and die sooner; and receive poorer care when they are in the hospital, even for acute situations like a motor vehicle crash.




Improving the Medicare Market


Book Description

Medicare beneficiaries are rapidly moving into managed care, as attempts to restrain the growth of this costly entitlement program progress. However, advocates for patients question whether the necessary information and structures are in place to enable Medicare consumers to select wisely among private-sector managed care options. Improving the Medicare Market examines how to give Medicare beneficiaries the same choice of health plan options enjoyed in the private sectorâ€"yet protect them as consumers and patients. This book recommends approaches to ensuring accountability and informed purchasing for Medicare beneficiaries in an environment of broader choice and managed careâ€"how the government should evaluate and approve plans, what role the traditional Medicare program should play, how to help to elderly understand their options, and many other practical matters. The committee discusses the information requirements of Medicare beneficiaries and explores in detail how best to respond to their special needs. And it examines the procedures that should be developed to provide the necessary protections for the elderly in a managed care system.




Medicare


Book Description

"GAO has long expressed concern that increases in Medicare spending are unsustainable and do not necessarily enhance health care quality. Traditional Medicare provider payment systems reward the volume of services instead of the quality or efficiency of care by paying physicians for each service provided. Some health systems, which can be hospitals, physicians, health plans, or a combination, use financial incentive programs to reward physicians for improving quality and efficiency with the goal of better outcomes for patients and savings for hospitals and payers. Federal laws that protect patients and the integrity of federal programs, including Medicare, limit health systems' ability to implement financial incentive programs. These fraud and abuse laws include the physician self-referral law, or Stark law; the anti-kickback statute; and the Civil Monetary Penalties (CMP) law. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of Inspector General (OIG) within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Department of Justice oversee and enforce these laws.GAO examined how federal fraud and abuse laws affect the implementation of financial incentive programs, stakeholders' perspectives on their ability to implement these programs, and alternative approaches through which HHS has approved implementation of these programs. GAO analyzed relevant laws and"