Mid-Term Evaluation Report on the Enhanced Data Dissemination Initiative Project


Book Description

This report presents the results of the mid-term evaluation of the Enhanced Data Dissemination Initiative (EDDI) financed by the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DFID) covering the period April 1, 2010 to September 30, 2012. The evaluation was conducted internally by the IMF in consultation with DFID. EDDI is a five-year project (April 2010–March 2015) implemented by the IMF to improve macroeconomic statistics in 25 African countries. The project includes modules for sub-groups of countries covering national accounts, monetary statistics, government finance statistics (GFS), balance of payments statistics (BOP), and harmonization of statistics in several regional organizations. The mid-point of a five-year project is an appropriate time for all stakeholders of the project to step back and take stock of what has been accomplished in the first half of the project, what has gone well, what aspects have been disappointing, and what might be adjusted or changed to make the remainder of the project more effective in achieving its objectives. To facilitate this process, questionnaires were developed to obtain feedback from three groups: counterparts in participating countries, IMF module managers and experts, and DFID country and regional advisors. Recommendations made by the stakeholders that will be followed up in the second half of the project are listed as bullets in italics below.







AFRITACs - Independent Midterm Evaluation - Volume 1-Final Report


Book Description

The evaluation focus was on three main objectives: Assessing whether the AFRITACs have provided value added to beneficiary countries; Assessing the extent to which the AFRITACs’ objectives have been achieved; and Assessing whether the AFRITACs have enhanced cooperation between stakeholders in their respective regions.







Support for an External and Independent LIFE Mid Term Evaluation Report


Book Description

This study presents the findings of the "Mid-Term Evaluation of the LIFE Programme". The purpose of the evaluation was to assess the functioning of the LIFE Programme, in line with the EU 'Better Regulation' agenda. The conclusions are derived from 96 questions addressing effectiveness, efficiency, coherence, relevance, EU added value, sustainability, impact, and other specific aspects of the Programme. To answer the evaluation questions, a triangulation process was used combining document review, quantitative analysis of LIFE/ LIFE+ monitoring indicators, interviews, a public consultation, and stakeholder surveys. The evaluation concludes that LIFE is delivering in line with set targets. There is evidence of a positive cost-benefit ratio when comparing funding to societal gains. LIFE is internally and externally coherent and its objectives relevant. Sustainability largely varies across the EU and per priority area, and uptake by the private sector can be improved. Financial instruments are still in their pilot phase and measures to enhance their effectiveness are indicated. Integrated Projects show potential to boost the implementation of relevant Union legislation. LIFE communication supports the visibility and dissemination of results, but could be better targeted and coordinated. Finally, simplification measures are needed to streamline cooperation at management level and improve the Programme's accessibility.










Mid-term evaluation of the project “Delivering sustainable environmental, social and economic benefits in West Africa through good governance, correct incentives and innovation”


Book Description

Coastal fisheries in West Africa are essential for providing food and employment, supporting the livelihoods of men and women and generating income. The overall objective of the project “Delivering sustainable environmental, social and economic benefits in West Africa through good governance, correct incentives and innovation” is to strengthen governance, management and value chains through the implementation of an ecosystem approach to fisheries, relevant international tools and innovative governance partnerships in Cabo Verde, Ivory Coast and Senegal. Overall, the evaluation rated the project as “relatively satisfactory". The evaluation recommended certain improvements, particularly concerning the recruitment strategy and organization of personnel, co-financing, the results framework and monitoring of activities.