Momentum Profits, Factor Pricing, and Macroeconomic Risk


Book Description

We study the connection between momentum portfolio returns and shifts in factor loadings on the growth rate of industrial production. Winners have temporarily higher loadings than losers. The loading spread derives mostly from the high, positive loadings of winners. Small stocks have higher loadings than big stocks, and value stocks have higher loadings than growth stocks. Using standard multifactor tests, we present evidence that the growth rate of industrial production is a priced risk factor. In most of our tests, however, the combined effect of factor pricing and risk shifts does not explain a large fraction of momentum returns.




Momentum Profits and Macroeconomic Risk


Book Description

"Previous work shows that the growth rate of industrial production is a common macroeconomic risk factor in the cross-section of expected returns. We demonstrate the connection between momentum profits and shifts in factor loadings on this macroeconomic variable. Winners have temporarily higher loadings on the growth rate of industrial production than losers. The loading dispersion derives mostly from the high, positive loadings of winners. Depending on model specification, this loading dispersion can explain up to 40% of momentum profits"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.




Momentum Profits and Macroeconomic Risk


Book Description

Previous work shows that the growth rate of industrial production is a common macroeconomic risk factor in the cross-section of expected returns. We demonstrate the connection between momentum profits and shifts in factor loadings on this macroeconomic variable. Winners have temporarily higher loadings on the growth rate of industrial production than losers. The loading dispersion derives mostly from the high, positive loadings of winners. Depending on model specification, this loading dispersion can explain up to 40% of momentum profits.




Macroeconomic Risk and Seasonality in Momentum Profits


Book Description

We contribute to the growing debate on the relation between macroeconomic risk and stock price momentum. Not only is momentum seasonal, so is its net factor exposure. We show that winners and losers only differ in macroeconomic factor loadings during January, the one month when losers overwhelmingly outperform winners. In the remainder of the year, when momentum does exist, winner and loser factor loadings offset nearly completely. Furthermore, the magnitude of macroeconomic risk premia appears to seasonally vary contra momentum. In contrast, the relatively new profitability factor does a much better job of capturing the described seasonality.




Economic Activity and Momentum Profits


Book Description

We show that economic activity plays an important role in explaining momentum-based anomalies. A simple two-factor model containing the market and alternative indicators of economic activity as risk factors--industrial production, capacity utilization rate, retail sales, and a broad economic index--offers considerable explanatory power for the cross-section of price and industry momentum portfolios. Hence past winners enjoy higher average returns than past losers because they have larger macroeconomic risk. The model compares favorably with popular multifactor models used in the literature. Moreover, our model is consistent with Merton's Intertemporal CAPM framework, since the macro variables forecast stock market volatility and future economic activity.




Do Pervasive Economic Factors Explain Momentum?


Book Description

This thesis investigates the relationship between the profitability of momentum strategies and macroeconomic variables associated with the business cycles. We hypothesize that momentum is a risk factor that correlates with economic dynamics, which drive stock prices. We apply the two-state Markov regime switching model of Hamilton (1989) to capture the dynamic behavior of the time series of momentum return across different regimes. We include both univariate and multivariate regressions to examine the explanatory power of independent variables during different states. Moreover, we explore whether economic dynamics and investor sentiment are the only sources of the pricing effect of momentum. We adjust the momentum returns for selected macroeconomic variables, risk factors and proxy for investor sentiment. We define the residuals from the model as "pure momentum" and test the pricing capability of pure momentum in a standard asset pricing model. Using a sample of monthly data of US market covering the period between August 1962 and December 2014, we document that macroeconomic factors, risk factors and investor sentiment are unable to fully explain the momentum profits. Using a sample of monthly return on portfolios constructed by double-sorting stocks on size and book-to-market equity ratio, which include NYSE, AMEX, and NASDAQ stocks, we show that the pricing capability of momentum cannot be entirely explained by macroeconomic variables, risk factors and investor sentiment.




Macroeconomic Risks and Characteristic-Based Factor Models


Book Description

We show that book-to-market, size, and momentum capture cross-sectional variation in exposures to a broad set of macroeconomic factors identified in the prior literature as potentially important for pricing equities. The factors considered include innovations in economic growth expectations, inflation, the aggregate survival probability, the term structure of interest rates, and the exchange rate. Factor mimicking portfolios constructed on the basis of book-to-market, size, and momentum therefore serve as proxy composite macroeconomic risk factors. Conditional and unconditional cross-sectional asset pricing tests indicate that most of the macroeconomic factors are priced. The performance of an asset pricing model based on the macroeconomic factors is comparable to the performance of the Fama and French (1992, 1993) model. However, the momentum factor is found to contain incremental information for asset pricing.




Economic Fundamentals, Risk, and Momentum Profits


Book Description

We study empirically the changes in economic fundamentals for firms with recent stock price momentum. We find that: (i) winners have temporarily higher dividend, investment, and sales growth rates, and losers have temporarily lower dividend, investment, and sales growth rates; (ii) the duration of the growth rate dispersion matches approximately that of the momentum profits; (iii) past returns are strong, positive predictors of future growth rates; and (iv) factor-mimicking portfolios on expected growth rates earn significantly positive returns on average. This evidence is consistent with the theoretical predictions of Johnson (2002), in which momentum returns reflect compensation for temporary shifts in risk associated with expected growth. Additional tests do not provide much support for a risk-based explanation, however.




Can a Risk-Based Factor Generate Momentum?


Book Description

We study whether a risk-based pricing source can generate momentum profits. We show both analytically and empirically that the Fama-French factor-adjusted return, or alphas, contains a missing risk-based component. A momentum strategy based on a proxy for this missing-factor component generates sizable profits. Returns of a factor-mimicking portfolio constructed on the basis of this proxy have robust and significant power in pricing cross-sectional variations of stock returns and forecasting future macroeconomic activities. This portfolio's stocks represent about 50% of winner/loser stocks of the momentum strategies based on either raw returns or alphas.




Macroeconomic Expectations and the Size, Value and Momentum Factors


Book Description

One challenge when examining the links between macroeconomic risks and the size (SMB), value (HML) and momentum (WML) factors is the difficulty of obtaining direct measures of macroeconomic expectations. We examine these relations using changes in macroeconomic forecasts and surprises to proxy for changes in expectations across 20 markets. The sensitivity of cash-flow-to-price based HML, SMB and WML is often insignificant and close to zero, or the factors hedge macroeconomic risk. Only book-to-market based HML is related to changes in GDP growth forecasts, but these findings are not robust when we examine the reaction to GDP surprises. Importantly, the weak relation between factors and risks is not the result of low power tests, but is due to the long and short portfolios having economically and statistically similar sensitivity to macroeconomic risks. Together these findings are inconsistent with HML, SMB and WML being priced as compensation for macroeconomic risks.