Nsiad-99-13 Military Base Closures


Book Description

NSIAD-99-13 Military Base Closures: Questions Concerning the Proposed Sale of Housing at Mather Air Force Base




Nsiad-99-36 Military Bases


Book Description

NSIAD-99-36 Military Bases: Status of Prior Base Realignment and Closure Rounds




Nsiad-99-17 Military Bases


Book Description

NSIAD-99-17 Military Bases: Review of DOD's 1998 Report on Base Realignment and Closure




Military Base Closures


Book Description

NSIAD-99-149 Military Base Closures: Potential to Offset Fiscal Year 2000 Budget Request




Nsiad-96-67 Military Bases


Book Description

NSIAD-96-67 Military Bases: Closure and Realignment Savings Are Significant, but Not Easily Quantified







Military Base Closures


Book Description

As the Dept. of Defense (DoD) prepares for the 2005 base realignment & closure (BRAC) round, questions continue to be raised about the transfer & environmental cleanup of unneeded property arising from the prior 4 BRAC rounds & their impact on cost & savings & on local economies. This report describes DoD's progress in implementing prior BRAC post-closure actions. It addresses: (1) the transfer of unneeded base property to other users, (2) the magnitude of the net savings accruing from the prior rounds, (3) estimated costs for environmental cleanup of BRAC property, & (4) the economic recovery of communities affected by base closures. Charts & tables.










Military base closures progress in completing actions from prior realignments and closures.


Book Description

Through base realignment and closure rounds in 1988, 1991, 1993, and 1995, the Department of Defense expected to significantly reduce its domestic infrastructure and provide needed dollars for high-priority programs such as modernization. With the conclusion of the 6-year implementation period of the last round in fiscal year 2001, the department has closed or realigned hundreds of bases, has generated savings from these actions, and is in the process of transferring unneeded base property to other users. At the same time, the communities surrounding the former defense bases continue the lengthy process of recovery from the economic impact of the closure process. Our last comprehensive report on the implementation of base closure decisions was issued in December 1998. In that report, we concluded that the closure process was generating substantial savings (although the savings estimates were imprecise), most former base property had not yet been transferred to other users, and most communities surrounding closed bases were faring well economically in relation to key national economic indicators. In a July 2001 report and August 2001 testimony, we updated our closure implementation data and reaffirmed the primary results of our prior work.