OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews: United States 2016


Book Description

The OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) conducts periodic reviews of the individual development co-operation efforts of DAC members. This is the review of the United States.




OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews: Spain 2016


Book Description

The OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) conducts periodic reviews of the individual development co-operation efforts of DAC members. The policies and programmes of each member are critically examined approximately once every five years.




OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews: Denmark 2016


Book Description

The OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) conducts periodic reviews of the individual development co-operation efforts of DAC members. The policies and programmes of each member are critically examined approximately once every five years.




OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews: Portugal 2016


Book Description

The OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) conducts periodic reviews of the individual development co-operation efforts of DAC members. The policies and programmes of each member are critically examined approximately once every five years.




OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews: Poland 2017


Book Description

The OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) conducts periodic reviews of the individual development co-operation efforts of DAC members. The policies and programmes of each member are critically examined approximately once every five years. This review assesses the performance of Poland ...







OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews: Czech Republic 2016


Book Description

The OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) conducts periodic reviews of the individual development co-operation efforts of DAC members. The policies and programmes of each member are critically examined approximately once every five years.




OECD Development Co-Operation Peer Reviews: Denmark 2016


Book Description

- Conducting the peer review - Abbreviations and acronyms - Denmark's aid at a glance - Context of the peer review of Denmark - The DAC's main findings and recommendations - Towards a comprehensive Danish development effort - Denmark's vision and policies for development co-operation - Allocating Denmark's official development assistance - Managing Denmark's development co-operation - Denmark's development co-operation delivery and partnerships - Results management and accountability of Denmark's development co-operation - Denmark's humanitarian assistance - Progress since the 2011 DAC peer review recommendations - OECD/DAC standard suite of tables - Field visit to Ghana - Organisational structure




OECD Development Co-Operation Peer Reviews OECD Development Co-Operation Peer Reviews


Book Description

The OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) conducts periodic reviews of the individual development co-operation efforts of DAC members. The policies and programmes of each member are critically examined approximately once every five years. DAC peer reviews assess the performance of a given member, not just that of its development co-operation agency, and examine both policy and implementation. They take an integrated, system-wide perspective on the development co-operation and humanitarian assistance activities of the member under review.




OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews: United States 2022


Book Description

The OECD's Development Assistance Committee (DAC) conducts peer reviews of individual members once every five to six years. Reviews seek to improve the quality and effectiveness of members' development co-operation, highlighting good practices and recommending improvements. The United States has led with substantial ODA contributions in response to multiple crises. Twenty-one US government agencies programme and deliver foreign assistance. USAID systematically incorporates collaboration, learning and adapting in its programme cycle and works to increase diversity, equity and inclusion by championing locally-led approaches. This peer review provides a set of recommendations for the United States to mitigate negative transboundary effects of its policies, promote more flexible budget appropriations in line with needs, equip its development finance institution to deliver and adopt a clearer approach to multilateral partnerships. It recommends that the United States puts development effectiveness at the heart of localisation, reinforce human resources, and consider conflict prevention in all country programmes.