Offsets in Defense Trade. Fifth Annual Report to Congress


Book Description

The U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Export Administration (BXA), Office of Strategic Industries & Economic Security is responsible for assessing the impact of offsets in defense trade on the United States under the authority of Section 309 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended.













Impact of Offsets in Defense-related Exports


Book Description

This is the summary of the first three annual reports under Section 309 of the Defense Production Act of 1984. The coordinating Committee prepared reports dated in Dec. 1985, 1986 and 1987 which were transmitted to Congress by the Director of OMB. These documents which are summarized in this report contain the detailed information required by the statute as well as related material. Of special interest are lengthy case studies of the offset arrangement associated with the sale of Patriot missile systems to the Federal Republic of Germany, the Netherlands and Japan; and the Airborne Warning and Control Systems (AWACA) to the United Kingdom and France. The annual reports are now available at NTIS."--Report documentation page.




Defense Trade


Book Description




Defence Offsets


Book Description




Defense Production Act


Book Description

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed: (1) the interagency process used to prepare the 1988 report on offsets in military exports; (2) the use of economic models to measure the impact of offsets; and (3) information on proposed amendments to the Defense Production Act. GAO found that: (1) agencies used an informal process to prepare the 1988 offsets report because they had no guidelines or written procedures; (2) the report summarized new data on prime contractors, but did not include any analysis of that data; (3) the report basically restated the findings of three prior reports to Congress and reproduced previous analyses based on case studies related to industrial competitiveness, employment, and international trade; (4) the methodology used to prepare the report did not identify the effect of offsets on specific critical industries; (5) differing agency views may have significantly affected the 1988 and previous reports' conclusions; and (6) proposed legislative amendments would better provide for the inclusion of differing views in the annual offsets report.