Preliminary Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Land Conveyance for Construction of Three Facilities at March Air Force Base, California


Book Description

This document analyzes the potential impacts of the proposed conveyance of 845 acres at March Air Force Base, California, to a private party in exchange for construction of three facilities elsewhere on the base. These facilities would be modern and efficient replacements for three existing facilities currently located on the 845-acre parcel to be conveyed: the Headquarters building of the 15th Air Force; the Non-commissioned Officers Professional Education Center; and the 15th Air Force Band Center. The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) addresses both the impacts of constructing the new facilities on the Main Base and the impacts of probable development on the 845-acre West March parcel after it has been conveyed to a private party. Environmental effects with the potential for leading to significant impacts were identified in several issue areas and mitigation measures have been suggested that would reduce these impacts to levels that are not significant.













Government Reports Annual Index


Book Description

Sections 1-2. Keyword Index.--Section 3. Personal author index.--Section 4. Corporate author index.-- Section 5. Contract/grant number index, NTIS order/report number index 1-E.--Section 6. NTIS order/report number index F-Z.










Preliminary Final Environmental Impact Statement


Book Description

The EIS was prepared to analyze the potential environmental consequences of the Proposed Action, the Outgrant Alternative, and No-Action Alternative. The Proposed Action is a transfer/leaseback of Brooks AFB, Texas, property. Under the Outgrant Alternative, the Air Force would outgrant portions of the base but would retain ownership. The project is intended to improve mission effectiveness and reduce the cost of providing quality installation support at Brooks AFB. The analysis examines the reasonably foreseeable environmental consequences of the Proposed Action and the Outgrant Alternative under three different land use scenarios. The land use scenarios represent varying approaches to implementing the BCBP in order to demonstrate the range of potential development and associated impacts that may occur under the BCBP. The No-Action Alternative would be a decision not to proceed with the BCBP.