Performers' Rights


Book Description

The second edition builds on the analysis of the 1988 Act, by considering the significant and ongoing impact of the European Union on the question of performers' rights. It contains analysis of the implementation of the Directives developed from the Copyright and the Challenge of Technology Green Paper. Particular attention is paid to the Rental and Lending Rights Directive, which was implemented in the United Kingdom at the end of 1996. Performers' Rights also discusses future European Union initiatives and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty. It remains the only text exclusively devoted to the subject of performers' rights. The practical and comprehensive approach, which looks at those weapons available to litigants and the implications of drafting performers' contracts, makes this a vital source of information. All legal advisers to the entertainment industry, and lawyers dealing with copyright in general, will find this book a valuable asset.







International Protection of Performers Rights


Book Description

With the development of technology such as films,sound recordings and the Internet, performers have lost control over the exploitation of their performances. The perceived need to protect performers on an international basis - that is, in states in which they are foreigners – has led to provisions being included in three international instruments (the Rome Convention (1961), TRIPS (1994), and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (1996)) that together form an international system of performers' rights. The scope of performers' rights protection is a contentious issue at the international level. The WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty nearly foundered on the issue of the level of protection to be granted to performers whose performances are exploited in films, videos and other audiovisual media; and a Diplomatic Conference held in Geneva in December 2000 failed to reach agreement on the terms of an international instrument protecting such performers. This is the first book in English to provide a comparative analysis of the protection afforded to performers in the international instruments. Although the focus is on establishing whether the international instruments provide an appropriate system of protection, attention is given to the key underlying issues: from whom or from what do performers need protection; can protection for performers be justified; what is a performance? Where appropriate, examples of domestic legislation and cases are drawn from the UK and other common law jurisdictions. This book will be of value to practitioners, academics and to government officials interested in determining the future shape of domestic law. It will also provide interesting and valuable assistance to officials in performers' and producers' unions and guilds.






















A Duty to Protect the Rights of Performers? Constitutional Foundations of an Intellectual Property Right


Book Description

The twentieth century has witnessed the birth and the upbringing of performers' rights. Although performances in general are interpretations of works of authorship, the international community has not followed national doctrines that provide performers with copyright protection. Performers, producers of phonograms, and broadcasting organizations have been granted related or neighboring rights instead. The existing international treaties in this field, such as the Rome Convention, TRIPS, and the WPPT have cemented this approach and many legal systems have implemented it.The impressive scope of protection on the international level does not determine its national level. Its existence does not itself justify why a state chooses to join international treaties. I argue that only national law, specifically national constitutions, can furnish compelling legal - not political - reasons whether and to what extent to establish protection for performers. In particular, I analyze whether the national law requires protection of performers by giving them exclusive rights in their performances. Comparing the legals systems of the U.S. and Germany I argue that the United States Constitution does not require a state to protect performers against exploitation of their performances by others. German constitutional law offers a strikingly different approach. The state has a duty to protect its citizen's fundamental rights against interference by non-state actors. The property clause in the Basic Law requires protection for performers. Finally, I propose a method to balance the competing interests known as the proportionality principle.