The Politics of Reapportionment


Book Description




The Reapportionment Revolution


Book Description




Reapportionment and Redistricting in the West


Book Description

Reapportionment and Redistricting in the West is a collection of essays and original research which examines the unique characteristics of redistricting in the western United States. It includes case studies of Arizona, California and Oregon as well as chapters on congressional reapportionment and redistricting in the west, how redistricting impacts the Latino population, redistricting law in the west, and much more.




Reapportionment


Book Description




The Impact of Reapportionment


Book Description







The Politics of Reapportionment


Book Description

Cover -- Half Title -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Contents -- Introduction to The Transaction Edition -- Foreword -- Part One: Political Patterns In Apportionment -- Part Two : Rural Control of The Legislature Through Apportionment -- 1. The California Senate: Sectional Conflict and Vox Populi -- 2. Colorado: A Matter of Balance -- 3. Florida: Politics and the "Pork Choppers" -- 4. North Carolina: People or Pine Trees -- 5. Kentucky: A Latent Issue -- 6. Texas: Factions in a One-Party Setting -- Part Three : Congressional Reapportionment and Partisan Deadlock -- 7. Equilibrium in Illinois: Frustration and Accommodation of the Parties -- 8. Pennsylvania: The Limits of Power in a Divided Government -- 9. Apportionment and Districting in Ohio: Components of Deadlock -- Part Four: Congressional Reapportionment Under One-Party Control -- 10. North Carolina: "This Bill or Nothing" -- 11. West Virginia: Tradition and Partisan Advantage -- 12. Maryland: Frustration of One-Party Control -- Part Five: Reapportionment as A Means of Political Control -- 13. New York: "Constitutionally Republican" -- 14. California: "Brutal Butchery of the Two-Party System"? -- Part Six: Bypassing The Legislature-An Urban Opportunity -- 15. Michigan Legislative Apportionment: Key to Constitutional Change -- 16. Maryland: Judicial Challenge to Rural Control -- 17. Tennessee: Inertia and the Courts -- Bibliographic Note -- Index




The Politics of Reapportionment


Book Description

Seventeen case studies of struggles for both legislative reapportionment and congressional redistricting in 14 states. The cases focus on the political factors in each state contributing to the apportionment pattern. The cases also identify the roles of key political groups in reapportionment and assess the political consequences of the various apportionment systems.




The Realities of Redistricting


Book Description

Allowing legislators to pick the voters that make up their districts is a fundamental conflict of interest and central concern for the popular sovereignty of American elections. In The Realities of Redistricting, Jonathan Winburn examines the extent of this potential problem by focusing on both the incentives and the constraints facing state legislators during the redistricting process. Most research on redistricting tends to examine only the outcomes produced in terms of partisan gains or losses; however, we know much less about what constrains political mapmakers during the process. We know even less about whether constraints built into the process are enough to limit the partisan manipulation of both district boundaries and electoral outcomes. From the beginning stages of redistricting to the resulting outcomes on election day, this book analyzes the constraints and incentives that state legislators face. By examining the entire process, this book investigates who holds the power in the process and improves our understanding of the conditions under which redrawing district boundaries have a significant influence on partisan politics throughout the country. Specifically, reformers, who generally argue for commissions, may find that focusing on the rules rather than the actors is a better path to improving the process. The Realities of Redistricting is an interesting and informative read for anyone concerned with one of the most contentious processes in the American system.




Democracy Delayed


Book Description

Historians have customarily explained the 1920s in terms of urban-rural conflict, arguing that cultural, ethnic, and economic differences between urban and rural Americans erupted to intensify and influence political conflict in the decade. In Democracy Delayed, Charles W. Eagles uses the issue of congressional reapportionment to examine politics in the 1920s, in particular to test the urban-rural thesis. After the 1920 census, the United States Congress for the first time failed to reapportion the House of Representatives as required by the Constitution. The 1920 enumeration showed that for the first time more people lived in urban areas than in rural areas. During a decade-long stalemate, congressional debates over reapportionment legislation contained repeated examples of violence and hostility as rural representatives resisted acceding to increased urban interests. Eagles points out that previous studies employing the urban-rural theory use an abstract model borrowed from the social sciences. Eagles combines historiography, narrative political history, and legislative roll-call analysis to provide extensive concrete evidence and a more precise definition of the urban-rural interpretation.