Reauthorizing No Child Left Behind


Book Description

Studies suggest that the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001's goal of 100 percent of U.S. students proficient in reading and mathematics by 2014 will not be met. The authors recommend more-uniform state academic standards and teacher requirements and broader measures of student learning, including more subjects and tests of higher-thinking and problem-solving skills.




Legislation in Need of Improvement


Book Description

Anticipating Congressional hearings related to reauthorizing the No Child Left Behind Act, this report provides an analysis of preliminary hearings and related reports and proposals. The specific focus is on whether the reauthorization process is likely to include a substantive discussion of what is needed to enable all children to have an equal opportunity to succeed at school. The following are appended: (1) Proposed Additions to the No Child Left Behind Act-- Moving Schools Forward in Developing a Comprehensive System of Learning Supports; and (2) A Unifying Framework and an Integrated Infrastructure for Schools to Address Barriers to Learning and Promote Healthy Development. (Contains 4 exhibits.).




A Policymaker's Guide to No Child Left Behind Reauthorization


Book Description

This spring, Congress is considering the reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind Act. In the 14 years since the law was passed, AEI Education has devoted extensive analysis to how it worked in practice. AEI has distilled their work into a series of brief chapters to provide a one-stop shop for understanding why the law was passed, what went wrong in its implementation, and what lessons were learned. The report presents some key takeaways such as: (1) The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) resulted from decades of frustration that the federal government was spending billions of dollars on K-12 education without establishing an effective way to measure the impact; (2) Although NCLB passed with a large majority, its passage required compromises that made the bill cumbersome and at odds with America's federalist system; and (3) As Congress considers reauthorizing NCLB, it should consider what the federal government can and cannot successfully do to improve K-12 education.




Joint Statement on Reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB).


Book Description

The National Governors Association, Council of Chief State School Officers, and the National Association of State Boards of Education jointly devised recommendations in 11 areas in order to achieve America's education goals for every student since the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001. These recommendations included giving states and schools the flexibility to use "growth models" to gain credit for increasing student achievement; creating rewards and differentiating consequences; supporting meaningful, long-term school reform; and ensuring fair testing of special populations. Recommendations also ask that the reauthorization include a renewed state-federal partnership that will provide states the flexibility to ensure the law works effectively in each state. The recommendations are made in an effort to improve the academic achievement of all students to ensure they are prepared for postsecondary education, work, and lifelong learning in the 21st century. These recommendations represent the major issues Congress will face in reauthorizing NCLB. The Governors (National Governors Association), chief state school officers (Council of Chief State School Officers), and state boards of education members (National Association of State Boards of Education) also recommend additional amendments to the law as outlined in their respective NCLB and Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) policies.




No Child Left Behind


Book Description

While few would quarrel with the goal of the No Child Left Behind legislation, the nation is badly divided over whether the law is having a positive effect on our schools. At the same time, it is also true that most Americans, including many professional educators, have only a limited understanding of the content and scope of the legislation. As we are currently engaged in a national debate about the future role of the federal government in the field of education, it is essential that people become better informed about the history, content, and results of No Child Left Behind. This book is a valuable tool informing the current discussion on the reauthorization of the law. As a result, the reader will be better able to make up his own mind as to the direction we should take as a nation in pursuing the noble objective of ensuring that no child is left behind.







Local Perspectives on the No Child Left Behind Act


Book Description




For Consideration in Reauthorizing the "No Child Left Behind Act"... Promoting a Systematic Focus on Learning Supports to Address Barriers to Learning and Teaching. A Center Policy Brief


Book Description

Anticipating Congressional hearings related to reauthorizing NCLB, this policy analysis report focuses on how learning supports can be enhanced in the reauthorized law. The intent is to enhance effectiveness in addressing the factors that interfere with a great many students succeeding at school. The emphasis is on fully integrating the development of a comprehensive system of learning supports as an essential component in school improvement efforts. Failure to develop such a system is seen as contributing to the perpetuation of achievement gaps and dropout rates and as playing a major role in the plateauing of achievement gains. [This report was produced by the UCLA School Mental Health Project / Center for Mental Health in Schools.].




An Education in Politics


Book Description

Since the early 1990s, the federal role in education-exemplified by the controversial No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)-has expanded dramatically. Yet states and localities have retained a central role in education policy, leading to a growing struggle for control over the direction of the nation's schools. In An Education in Politics, Jesse H. Rhodes explains the uneven development of federal involvement in education. While supporters of expanded federal involvement enjoyed some success in bringing new ideas to the federal policy agenda, Rhodes argues, they also encountered stiff resistance from proponents of local control. Built atop existing decentralized policies, new federal reforms raised difficult questions about which level of government bore ultimate responsibility for improving schools. Rhodes's argument focuses on the role played by civil rights activists, business leaders, and education experts in promoting the reforms that would be enacted with federal policies such as NCLB. It also underscores the constraints on federal involvement imposed by existing education policies, hostile interest groups, and, above all, the nation's federal system. Indeed, the federal system, which left specific policy formation and implementation to the states and localities, repeatedly frustrated efforts to effect changes: national reforms lost their force as policies passed through iterations at the state, county, and municipal levels. Ironically, state and local resistance only encouraged civil rights activists, business leaders, and their political allies to advocate even more stringent reforms that imposed heavier burdens on state and local governments. Through it all, the nation's education system made only incremental steps toward the goal of providing a quality education for every child.