Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Alabama, During June Term, 1859, and January Term, 1860, Vol. 35 (Classic Reprint)


Book Description

Excerpt from Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Alabama, During June Term, 1859, and January Term, 1860, Vol. 35 Stone, J. - The counsel for appellant have not pressed upon our consideration any questions save those raised by the refusal of the probate court to give the charges numbered 12 to 15, inclusive. Under these circumstances, we propose to make but brief allusion to the questions not pressed in argument. The questions raised on the introduction of evidence, were all ruled adversely to the appellant, when this case was before this court, at June term, 1858. - See 33 Ala. 145. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.




Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Alabama During June Term, 1858, and January Term, 1859, Vol. 33 (Classic Reprint)


Book Description

Excerpt from Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Alabama During June Term, 1858, and January Term, 1859, Vol. 33 There is no reversible error, and the judgment is affirmed. Stone, J - I think this case should be reversed, on that part of the affirmative charge which relates to the doctrine of waiver. The charge asserts, in effect, that if the evidence be believed, the act of the president of the company was a waiver of all defects in the preliminary proof. While Iwould feel inclined to agree with the majority of the court, if the reply of the president were all the evidence on that point; yet Ithink, under the facts disclosed in this record; that inquiry should have gone to the jury. The testimony of Allen, if believed, shows that, before the assured had submitted any preliminary proof, his attorney was notified that the company would require a compliance with the conditions of the policy, to the very letter. Crandall subsequently, and before the company refused payment, made an unsuccessful attempt to procure a certificate from a magistrate near the scene of the fire and, I have no doubt, would have furnished the proper certificate, if he could have procured it. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.




Report of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Alabama, Vol. 36


Book Description

Excerpt from Report of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Alabama, Vol. 36: During January and June Terms, 1860 M. A. Baldwin, attorney general. John D. Phelan, clerk. S. Albright, marshal. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.










Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Alabama, During the January and June Terms, 1869, Vol. 43 (Classic Reprint)


Book Description

Excerpt from Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Alabama, During the January and June Terms, 1869, Vol. 43 The novelty and variety of questions, (arising out of the changed condition of things, ) discussed and decided at those terms, rendered the early publication of this report a necessity. Under these circumstances, the Reporter felt compelled to edit and publish the present volume in much greater haste than was desirable. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.




Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Alabama, Vol. 39


Book Description

Excerpt from Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Alabama, Vol. 39: During the January and June Terms, 1863; January and June Terms, 1864; January Term, 1865; And the January Term, 1866 State, ex rel. Dawson, in re Strawbridge Mays State, ex rel Ellerbe, in re Dan iel State, ex rel. Graham, in re Em erson 437 State, ex rel. Graham, in re Pille 459 State, ex rel. Graham, in re Toner 454 Steamboat Battle v. Waring 180 Stetson Co. Ats. Goldsmith 183 Strawbridge Mays, State, ex rel. &c., in re Sullivan v. Robinson Tate, Ex parte Tolison v. The State Toner, State, ex rel. Graham. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.







Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Alabama, During January and June Terms, 1859, Vol. 34 (Classic Reprint)


Book Description

Excerpt from Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Alabama, During January and June Terms, 1859, Vol. 34 Mcree v. Mcree 165 mcree's Adm'rs v. Means 349 Means ats. Meree's Adm'rs 349 Minor Bizzell ate Jemison. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.