Sharing the Benefits of the EU's Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base Within Corporate Groups


Book Description

One of the main features of the common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB) Draft Directive, the formulary apportionment of the consolidated group income, leads to a significant change in corporate income taxation paradigms. Currently, corporations are taxed on a separate entity basis using the arm's length principle to evaluate intra-group transactions. Similarly company law uses a separate entity approach with regard to transactions between related parties. The CCCTB Draft Directive will regularly lead to allocation results that are explicitly not at arm's length as the arm's length principle will not be necessary anymore for tax purposes. However, without a corresponding change in company law paradigms - which is not foreseeable - the current lockstep between corporate income tax law and company law will cease to exist. Yet, not only the proposed CCCTB regime but also existing group taxation systems produce taxable outcomes that are not in accordance with the domestic company laws' single entity approaches. This article therefore analyses group taxation systems currently employed by EU Member States and shows that the vast majority of group taxation systems employ instruments to (re-)unite the results from the joint taxation with company law's separate entity approach. These accompanying mechanisms ensure a fair distribution of the advantages and disadvantages of the respective intra-group loss-offset system to all group members. However, due to various reasons, one being the fact that every group member of the CCCTB will be responsible for a share of the group's overall tax liability, another being the fact that different tax rates will apply within one CCCTB group, these currently employed mechanisms and techniques are not suitable for the CCCTB concept. Therefore this article develops a distinct mechanism to share the benefits of the CCCTB concept within the whole group. The current international debate on the suitability of the arm's length to continue as a standard for the allocation of taxing powers in intra-group transactions and the new impetus for the common tax base in some EU Member States may suggest that there is a new potential momentum to make progress in the introduction of formulary apportionment within the European Union.Full-text Paper.




A Common Tax Base for Multinational Enterprises in the European Union


Book Description

Carsten Wendt analyses the necessity, the concept as well as potential advantages and effects of a common tax base for multinational enterprises in the European Union. He addresses important issues concerning a common tax base, such as the definition of the consolidated group, the technique and scope of consolidation and the formula used to allocate the consolidated tax base among the involved member states.




Corporate Income Taxation in Europe


Book Description

The book considers the impact of the CCCTB from the perspective of non-EU-based enterprises that are carrying on business in the EU through the operation of branches or subsidiaries in member states. It incorporates the perspectives of leading scholars




The EU Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base


Book Description

In October 2016, the European Commission relaunched its plan to harmonize national income tax systems via the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB), perhaps the most ambitious reform of EU tax law ever attempted. This timely book offers an early analysis of this important proposal and its implications, covering issues such as the project’s scope and main elements, international considerations, the relationship with OECD’s base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) initiative, consolidation, and anti-abuse rules. With carefully selected papers first presented at a January 2017 conference hosted by the Amsterdam Centre for Tax Law, this volume focuses on such topics and issues as the following: – ways in which the proposed CCCTB is designed to preserve the competence of Member States to set their own tax rates; – reduction of the administrative burden for multinational companies; – incentives for research and development; – automatic cross-border relief within the EU; – detailed analysis of the proposal’s formula apportionment regime; – proposed new controlled foreign company (CFC) rules; and – interest limitation rule. Because of the commitment of many Member States to keep their corporate income tax systems competitive on a stand-alone basis, the proposed CCCTB is enormously controversial. This book provides authoritative insights into problems likely to arise and discusses the prospects of how the proposal is likely to be implemented. Thus, this book proves to be of immeasurable value to taxation policymakers, practitioners, and academics.




Towards a Neutral Formulary Apportionment System in Regional Integration


Book Description

International tax regimes and practices are heavily criticized for failing to fairly levy corporate tax on giant multinational taxpayers in the current globalized and digitalized world. This important and far-seeing book demonstrates how formulary apportionment (FA) – an approach by which a multinational corporation pays each jurisdiction’s corporate tax based on the share of its worldwide income allocated to that jurisdiction – can achieve the much-sought goal of aligning value creation and taxation. The author, through an intensive analysis of the European Union’s (EU’s) Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) Directive Proposal(s) and comparison to the United States (US’s) formulary apportionment experience, shows how the perceived problems with an FA system can be overcome and lays out the necessary elements for its feasibility. With detailed attention to the debates around formulary apportionment and its theoretical foundations, the book provides a blueprint for rebuilding the normative framework for the EU’s tax reform by clearly analysing the implications of the following and more: theorising public benefits to be represented by taxation; reorganising different economic theories about tax neutrality and tax justice; advancing the comparative legal research methodology to analyse law reform by combining the functional approach and the problem-solving approach; designing the logical formulary apportionment system for digital economy; ensuring the removal of the incentive for multinationals to shift reported income to low-tax locations; reducing the tax system’s complexity and the administrative burden it imposes on firms; eliminating transfer pricing complexity for intra-firm transactions; achieving equal weighting of the sales factor, the labour factor, and the asset factor in the formula; application of ‘destination-based’ rule for attributing the sales factor; and replacing the traditional permanent establishment nexus with a ‘factor presence nexus’. The presentation incorporates extensive comparison between the EU’s formulary apportionment tax reform option and FA systems existing in the United States (US) at state level, including reference to relevant US case law and legislation. As a possible option to address the problem of base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS), formulary apportionment is gaining increasing acceptance and attention. This book will prove invaluable to taxation authorities, tax practitioners, and scholars in its deeply informed and systematic guidance on good practices and prevention of problematic experiences in establishing and implementing an effective and market-neutral FA system.




Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base


Book Description

The European Commission is currently working on a legislative draft to harmonise the corporate income tax provisions for multinational groups of companies throughout the European Union. For that purpose the European Commission has installed a working group with the mission to draft a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) applicable for multinational companies. As the EU member states are not willing to surrender their taxing power to the supranational level of the EU each group entity2s tax base would be determined by apportionment of the group2s overall taxable income according to a predefined micro-economic factor based formula whereas the group income will be calculated by consolidating earnings beforehand separately determined by each group entity (preconsolidation income). The situs state of the particular group entity would then apply its statutory corporate tax rate on the apportioned tax base. This paper evaluates the effects of this prospective apportionment procedure on any given corporate group entity and finds that the share of the group2s income allocated to a particular entity using the apportionment formula does regularly not equal the pre-consolidation income of the respective group entity. The reasons for this regular observable deviation can be found on the one hand in the concept of the apportionment formula and on the other hand in the specifics of the definitions of the apportionment factors. (author's abstract).




Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base and Limitation on Benefits Clauses


Book Description

Based on a thorough analysis of the formulary apportionment procedure proposed by the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) draft directive, this article evaluates the interaction between the proposed CCCTB concept and existing/future anti-treaty shopping measures, especially Limitation on Benefits (LoB) clauses. Corporate groups that are taxed according to the CCCTB concept would regularly fail the ownership and base erosion tests of standard LoB clauses. Therefore, the treaty benefits would be denied. This interplay is especially critical for the future of tax relations between the EU Member States and the US since their bilateral treaties predominately use LoBs. The findings, however, are not limited to these relations but are of worldwide interest since OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Action 6 proposes the introduction of a LoB Clause to the OECD Model Convention. Irrespective of the substantial legal uncertainty relating to the compatibility of LoB clauses with EU law, this article shows that both the existing LoB clause as well as that proposed by BEPS Action 6 are incompatible with the CCCTB concept. The most feasible way of bringing these two layers of corporate income tax rules into accordance with each other seems to be by way of a harmonised EU-wide approach to negotiating new and renegotiating existing tax treaties with third countries conducted by the EU Commission.




The European Commission's Proposal for a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base


Book Description

The European Commission is currently preparing a proposal for a directive on the introduction of a common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB). This paper reviews the current state of the European Commission's preparation of the CCCTB proposal and discusses the implications for efficiency and fairness of the tax system. The analysis concludes that more evidence of significant economic benefits from introducing a CCCTB would be required to generate widespread support for the project.




A Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base for Europe – Eine einheitliche Körperschaftsteuerbemessungsgrundlage für Europa


Book Description

Preface This book contains the proceedings of the International Tax Conference on the c- th th mon consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB) that was held in Berlin on 15 – 16 may 2007. The conference was jointly organised by the German Federal Ministry of Finance, the Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Mannheim, and the Max Planck Institute (MPI) for Intellectual Property, Competition and Tax Law, Munich. More than 250 participants from all over Europe and other regions, scholars, politicians, business people and tax administrators, discussed the Eu- pean Commission’s proposal to establish a CCCTB. Three panels of tax experts evaluated the common tax base with respect to structural elements, consolidation, allocation, international aspects and administration. The conference made clear that the CCCTB has the potential to overcome some of the most intriguing problems of corporate income taxation within the Common Market. Common tax accounting rules substantially reduce compliance and administrative costs. Consolidation of a group’s profits and losses effects cro- border loss compensation which removes a major tax obstacle for European cro- border investment. At the same time, tax planning with respect to financing and transfer pricing is pushed back within the European Union. Moreover, as far as the CCCTB applies, member states are able to remove tax provisions that are targeted at cross border tax evasion and that might be challenged by the jurisdiction of the Eu- pean Court of Justice.




Harmful Tax Competition An Emerging Global Issue


Book Description

Tax competition in the form of harmful tax practices can distort trade and investment patterns, erode national tax bases and shift part of the tax burden onto less mobile tax bases. The Report emphasises that governments must intensify their cooperative actions to curb harmful tax practices.