Bayesian Analysis of Additive Factor Volatility Models with Heavy-Tailed Distributions with Specific Reference to S&P 500 and SSEC Indices


Book Description

The distribution of the financial return series is unsuitable for normal distribution. The distribution of financial series is heavier than the normal distribution. In addition, parameter estimates obtained in the presence of outliers are unreliable. Therefore, models that allow heavy-tailed distribution should be preferred for modelling high kurtosis. Accordingly, univariate and multivariate stochastic volatility models, which allow heavy-tailed distribution, have been proposed to model time-varying volatility. One of the multivariate stochastic volatility (MSVOL) model structures is factor-MSVOL model. The aim of this study is to investigate the convenience of Bayesian estimation of additive factor-MSVOL (AFactor-MSVOL) models with normal, heavy-tailed Student-t and Slash distributions via financial return series. In this study, AFactor-MSVOL models that allow normal, Student-t, and Slash heavy-tailed distributions were estimated in the analysis of return series of S&P 500 and SSEC indices. The normal, Student-t, and Slash distributions were assigned to the error distributions as the prior distributions and full conditional distributions were obtained by using Gibbs sampling. Model comparisons were made by using DIC. Student-t and Slash distributions were shown as alternatives of normal AFactor-MSVOL model.




Hyperbolic Normal Stochastic Volatility Model


Book Description

For option pricing models and heavy-tailed distributions, this study proposes a continuous-time stochastic volatility model based on an arithmetic Brownian motion: a one-parameter extension of the normal stochastic alpha-beta-rho (SABR) model. Using two generalized Bougerol's identities in the literature, the study shows that our model has a closed-form Monte-Carlo simulation scheme and that the transition probability for one special case follows Johnson's SU distribution -- a popular heavy-tailed distribution originally proposed without stochastic process. It is argued that the SU distribution serves as an analytically superior alternative to the normal SABR model because the two distributions are empirically similar.




Handbook Of Heavy-tailed Distributions In Asset Management And Risk Management


Book Description

The study of heavy-tailed distributions allows researchers to represent phenomena that occasionally exhibit very large deviations from the mean. The dynamics underlying these phenomena is an interesting theoretical subject, but the study of their statistical properties is in itself a very useful endeavor from the point of view of managing assets and controlling risk. In this book, the authors are primarily concerned with the statistical properties of heavy-tailed distributions and with the processes that exhibit jumps. A detailed overview with a Matlab implementation of heavy-tailed models applied in asset management and risk managements is presented. The book is not intended as a theoretical treatise on probability or statistics, but as a tool to understand the main concepts regarding heavy-tailed random variables and processes as applied to real-world applications in finance. Accordingly, the authors review approaches and methodologies whose realization will be useful for developing new methods for forecasting of financial variables where extreme events are not treated as anomalies, but as intrinsic parts of the economic process.




Handbook of Heavy Tailed Distributions in Finance


Book Description

The Handbooks in Finance are intended to be a definitive source for comprehensive and accessible information in the field of finance. Each individual volume in the series should present an accurate self-contained survey of a sub-field of finance, suitable for use by finance and economics professors and lecturers, professional researchers, graduate students and as a teaching supplement. The goal is to have a broad group of outstanding volumes in various areas of finance. The Handbook of Heavy Tailed Distributions in Finance is the first handbook to be published in this series.This volume presents current research focusing on heavy tailed distributions in finance. The contributions cover methodological issues, i.e., probabilistic, statistical and econometric modelling under non- Gaussian assumptions, as well as the applications of the stable and other non -Gaussian models in finance and risk management.







The Fundamentals of Heavy Tails


Book Description

Heavy tails –extreme events or values more common than expected –emerge everywhere: the economy, natural events, and social and information networks are just a few examples. Yet after decades of progress, they are still treated as mysterious, surprising, and even controversial, primarily because the necessary mathematical models and statistical methods are not widely known. This book, for the first time, provides a rigorous introduction to heavy-tailed distributions accessible to anyone who knows elementary probability. It tackles and tames the zoo of terminology for models and properties, demystifying topics such as the generalized central limit theorem and regular variation. It tracks the natural emergence of heavy-tailed distributions from a wide variety of general processes, building intuition. And it reveals the controversy surrounding heavy tails to be the result of flawed statistics, then equips readers to identify and estimate with confidence. Over 100 exercises complete this engaging package.




On a Topic of Generalized Linear Mixed Models and Stochastic Volatility Model


Book Description

(Uncorrected OCR) Abstract of the thesis entitled On a Topic of Generalized Linear Mixed Models and Stochastic Volatility Model submitted by Yam, Ho Kwan for the degree of Master of Philosophy at The University of Hong Kong in October 2002 Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs) are extensions to the Generalized Linear Models (GLMs). The inclusion of random effects into the models widens the scope of applicability of GLMMs considerably. However, it also increases the computational effort in estimation. There are various methodologies in making inference on the GLMMs nowadays. We attempt to investigate the use of Gibbs output within the Bayesian framework to carry out the Monte Carlo Approximation of the complicated likelihood function involving random effects by a classical likelihood approach. This methodology is a combination of classical likelihood and Bayesian approaches and it serves as a bridge between them. We will demonstrate this methodology using a famous Salamander Mating data reported by McCullagh and Nelder (1989). Moreover, although the normal distribution plays an important role in statistics, it is not suitable for modeling GLMMs with outlying random effects. The use of a general class of random effects models, such as heavy-tailed distributions should be considered. We will further investi- i gate the use of the Student-i distribution on the random effects in the Salamander Mating data. Furthermore, we suggest to adopt a scale mixture of normal form on the Student-i distribution for simplification of calculation and at the same time, locating the outliers directly through the mixing parameters. Nevertheless, since most financial and economic data exhibits a thick tail behavior, we further investigate the use of heavy tail distributions instead of normal distribution on these kinds of data. A two stage hierarchical scale mixture form on the Student-^ distribution will be demonstrated on the Stochastic Volatility (SV) model in a Bayesian aspect. it.




Alternative Formulations of the Leverage Effect in a Stochastic Volatility Model with Asymmetric Heavy-Tailed Errors


Book Description

This paper investigates three formulations of the leverage effect in a stochastic volatility model with a skewed and heavy-tailed observation distribution. The first formulation is the conventional one, where the observation and evolution errors are correlated. The second is a hierarchical one, where log-volatility depends on the past log-return multiplied by a time-varying latent coefficient. In the third formulation, this coefficient is replaced by a constant. The three models are compared with each other and with a GARCH formulation, using Bayes factors. MCMC estimation relies on a parametric proposal density estimated from the output of a particle smoother. The results, obtained with recent S&P500 and Swiss Market Index data, suggest that the last two leverage formulations strongly dominate the conventional one. The performance of the MCMC method is consistent across models and sample sizes, and its implementation only requires a very modest (and constant) number of filter and smoother particles.