Perceptions of Teachers and Administrators Regarding the Teacher Evaluation Process


Book Description

Author's abstract: Teacher evaluations can be a tool for increasing teacher effectiveness and accountability if it is determined how evaluations can be best used. According to current literature, this is not the case. It is more pertinent than ever that administrators use evaluations to strengthen marginal teachers and further develop skills of teachers who are already proficient. However, few studies exist pertaining to teacher and administrator perceptions of teacher evaluation effectiveness and even fewer focus Georgia teacher evaluations. The purpose of this descriptive study was to investigate perceptions of the teacher evaluation process held by teachers and administrators in southeast Georgia so that improvements to the teacher evaluation process could be considered. Survey data were collected (277 teachers and 12 administrators) representing three rural school districts in southeast Georgia. Data collection tools included the Teacher Evaluation Profile for Teachers and Administrators. Both included questions that participants rated based on a Likert-type scale. In addition to the Likert-types questions, one-open ended question was included that allowed teachers and administrators to reflect upon the current process for teacher evaluation used in their systems. Findings from both the Likert-type response questions and the open-ended question were analyzed with comparative differences between the survey and the open-iiended response data. Data were analyzed by position (teacher and administrator). Responses on the survey questions were positive from both teachers and administrators. A large number of teachers (43.73%) indicated that the evaluation process in their system was average and that these evaluations had a strong impact on professional practices (20.15%). According to teachers, the strongest attribute of the evaluation process was that the feedback focused on the standards whereas administrators indicated that the timing of the feedback was the greatest attribute of the evaluation process. In addition, administrators believed that teacher evaluations have the greatest impact on student learning. This study demonstrated that both teachers and administrators are reasonably satisfied with the teacher evaluation process. This study resulted in limited findings that would indicate a complete overhaul of the evaluation process, but it suggests that minor changes could be made to enhance the overall usefulness of teacher evaluations.







School-Level Administrator and Teacher Perceptions of the Impact of Teacher Evaluations on Classroom Instruction


Book Description

Teacher evaluations have a substantial impact on student achievement. Students rely on their teachers to provide them with the necessary knowledge and skills to succeed in today’s ever- changing world. Teachers are required to meet the needs of every student and perform to the best of their ability. Administrators support and evaluate teachers to help them make important decisions about their instructional practices. The purpose of the current study explored teacher and administrator perceptions of teacher evaluation ratings and its impact on classroom instruction. The current study utilized the principle of personal mastery as it assessed the impact teacher evaluations have on teacher practices during classroom instruction. A qualitative research design was used to collect and analyze survey data from Georgia teachers and school-level administrators.




Investigating a Teacher Evaluation System


Book Description

Increasing public criticism of traditional teacher evaluation systems based largely on classroom observations has spurred an unprecedented shift in the debate surrounding educational accountability policies, specifically about the purposes for and measures used to evaluate teachers. In response to growing public demand and associated federal mandates, states have been prompted to design and implement teacher evaluation systems that use increasingly available, statistically complex models (i.e., value-added) intended to isolate and measure the effects of individual teachers on student academic growth over time. The purpose of this study was to examine the perceptions of school administrators and teachers within one of the largest school districts in the state of Arizona with regards to the design and implementation of a federally-supported, state policy-directed teacher evaluation system based on professional practice and value-added measures. While much research has been conducted on teacher evaluation, few studies have examined teacher evaluation systems in context to better understand the standards of effectiveness used by school administrators and teachers to measure system effectiveness. The perceptions of school administrators and teachers, considering their lived experiences as the subjects of the nation's new and improved teacher evaluation systems in context, must be better understood if state and federal policymakers are to also better recognize and understand the consequences (intended and unintended) associated with the design and implementation of these systems in practice.







Teacher Evaluation in Practice


Book Description

As part of UChicago CCSR's ongoing study of Chicago Public Schools' new teacher evaluation system, this report looks at teacher and principal perceptions in the second year of implementation. It finds teachers and principals remain positive about the new evaluation system, though less so than in Year 1. This brief, a continuation of the work that began in Teacher Evaluation in Practice: Implementing Chicago's REACH Students, draws on survey data from more than 19,000 teachers and nearly 800 principals and assistant principals to measure their views of REACH (Recognizing Educators Advancing Chicago's Students). REACH replaced the previous checklist system, which rated nearly all teachers as excellent or superior and failed to provide much useful feedback for improving teacher practice.










Teacher and Administrator Perceptions Toward the Teacher Evaluation Within a Suburban School Disctrict in Pennsylvania


Book Description

The purpose of this qualitative study was to determine teacher and administrator perceptions toward the teacher evaluation process used within a suburban school district in Pennsylvania. Fifty-eight teachers (28 in elementary school, 9 in middle school, and 21 in high school) and seven administrators (5 principals and 2 assistant principals) participated in the questionnaire portion of the study. Individual interviews with 14 participants (9 teachers and 5 administrators) provided additional insight of their perceptions. Results of the study indicated that participants agreed overall that they deem their district's current evaluation process to be a quality experience. Data also revealed that participants suggested that communication, collaboration, and specific feedback were critical components to an effective teacher evaluation system. Results also indicated that results showed that while teachers see the process as mainly about teacher growth, administrators see the process as mainly about teacher accountability. As a result, teachers would like to continue with the current evaluation system, but administrators would like to see the process changed. The data also revealed that teachers believed the feedback they receive from administrators as average while administrators indicated that they believe the feedback they provide to teachers is very specific and detail oriented.