The Army's Occupational Analysis Program


Book Description

The mission of the Occupational Analysis (OA) Program is to provide the Army's manpower, personnel, and training (MPT) communities with the individual task information critical to job design, analysis and training development. It is through the integration of the requirements of these three communities at the military occupational specialty (MOS) or job level that the OA Program supports the field commander, the ultimate customer for occupational analysis in the Army. The OA Program is to be the Army's center of excellence for job analysis and design. The program is in a transition period, adapting its procedures and methods to meet the needs of today's fast-paced Army. Through the adoption of contemporary technology, the OA Program is committed to providing its customers in the MPT communities rapid, clear information needed to help ensure that the right soldiers, with the appropriate skills, are available to meet Army-wide requirements. This progress report details the OA Program and provides examples of occupational analysis products.




The Changing Nature of Work


Book Description

Although there is great debate about how work is changing, there is a clear consensus that changes are fundamental and ongoing. The Changing Nature of Work examines the evidence for change in the world of work. The committee provides a clearly illustrated framework for understanding changes in work and these implications for analyzing the structure of occupations in both the civilian and military sectors. This volume explores the increasing demographic diversity of the workforce, the fluidity of boundaries between lines of work, the interdependent choices for how work is structured-and ultimately, the need for an integrated systematic approach to understanding how work is changing. The book offers a rich array of data and highlighted examples on: Markets, technology, and many other external conditions affecting the nature of work. Research findings on American workers and how they feel about work. Downsizing and the trend toward flatter organizational hierarchies. Autonomy, complexity, and other aspects of work structure. The committee reviews the evolution of occupational analysis and examines the effectiveness of the latest systems in characterizing current and projected changes in civilian and military work. The occupational structure and changing work requirements in the Army are presented as a case study.




Evaluating the O*NET Occupational Analysis System for Army Competency Development


Book Description

"The present evaluation focused primarily on the usefulness of the O*NET system for Army occupational analysis for selection and classification purposes. The evaluation focused on the appropriateness of O*NET descriptors that would typically be used in an Army occupation analysis for selection and classification purposes: abilities, skills, generalized work activities (GWAs), and work context. Four civilian and four officer occupations were selected for this research. The objective was to produce data for the military occupations that could be compared to civilian O*NET data. Therefore, it was important to follow processes currently used by O*NET for data collection. In effect, this meant collecting information on occupational tasks, abilities skills, GWAs, and work context from Army Subject Matter Exports (SMEs) and collecting ability and skill ratings using trained analysts. The results showed that Army SMEs as well as other types of analysts could make reliable ratings on the O*NET descriptors. Potential uses for the O*NET descriptors are discussed."--P. i.




Military Occupational Analysis: Issues and Advances in Research and Application


Book Description

Historically, some of the most significant research and development (R & D) in occupational analysis (OA) has been accomplished by military organizations for military applications. Several of the most important OA methodologies were developed under military sponsorship. Examples include functional job analysis, worker-oriented approaches (the Position Analysis Questionnaire, the General Work Inventory, etc.), and the Task Inventory/Comprehensive Occupational Data Analysis Programs (CODAP) approach. Significant advances are continuing to be made in occupational analysis for military applications. Many military organizations are major users of these technologies. The major methods developed for military applications are used in the civilian world as well, in both the public and private sectors. This report highlights recent research advances and applications of military OA technology. It is designed to bring military psychologists up to date concerning OA technology for military applications and the impact that military occupational analysis is having on civilian practice. First, the history of occupational analysis R & D and application in military organizations is reviewed, to establish the context for ensuing chapters covering current military OA R & D results and applications. The various chapters address OA in both U.S. and allied nations' service organizations. In addition, civilian applications of military OA technology are discussed. Finally, future directions for OA are highlighted. The potential use of OA methods for modeling organizational structure, and for informing organizational interventions (e.g., job enlargement, training, technostructural change), is also discussed. The final chapter includes a proposed research agenda for future military occupational analysis R & D based on comments received from symposium discussants.




Evaluating the O*NET Occupational Analysis System for Army Competency Development


Book Description

"The present evaluation focused primarily on the usefulness of the O*NET system for Army occupational analysis for selection and classification purposes. The evaluation focused on the appropriateness of O*NET descriptors that would typically be used in an Army occupation analysis for selection and classification purposes: abilities, skills, generalized work activities (GWAs), and work context. Four civilian and four officer occupations were selected for this research. The objective was to produce data for the military occupations that could be compared to civilian O*NET data. Therefore, it was important to follow processes currently used by O*NET for data collection. In effect, this meant collecting information on occupational tasks, abilities skills, GWAs, and work context from Army Subject Matter Exports (SMEs) and collecting ability and skill ratings using trained analysts. The results showed that Army SMEs as well as other types of analysts could make reliable ratings on the O*NET descriptors. Potential uses for the O*NET descriptors are discussed."--P. i.







FY ... Program


Book Description




Soldier's Manual


Book Description




Army Enlisted Personnel Competency Assessment Program: Phase III Pilot Tests


Book Description

"In the early 1990s, the Department of the Army abandoned its Skill Qualification Test (SOT) program due primarily to maintenance, development, and administration costs. This left a void in the Army's capabilities for assessing job performance qualification. To meet this need, the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences (ARI) instituted a 3-year program of feasibility research related to the development of a Soldier assessment system that is both effective and affordable. The PerformM21 program has two mutually supporting tracks. The first focuses on the design of a testing program and identification of issues related to its implementation. The second track is a demonstration of concept - starting with a prototype core assessment targeted to all Soldiers eligible for promotion to Sergeant, followed by job-specific prototype assessments for several Military Occupational Specialties (MOS). The prototype assessments were developed during the first 2 years of the research program. The present report describes work conducted in the final year of the PerformM21 program, in which five prototype MOS-specific assessments (along with the common core examination) were pilot tested on a sample of specialists/corporals."--Stinet.