Advanced Progressive Matrices


Book Description

Advanced test of non-verbal reasoning ability, ie. a measure of eductive ability or fluid intelligence which is relatively independent of specific learning acquired in a particular cultural or educational context. Test is used as a means of assessing all the anlytical and integral operations involed in the higher thought processes and differentiaties clearly between people of even superior intellectual ability.




Are We Getting Smarter?


Book Description

Seeks to explain the 'Flynn effect' (massive IQ gains over time) and its consequences for gender, race and social equality.




Handbook of Nonverbal Assessment


Book Description

The goal of this Handbook is to describe the current assessment strategies and related best practices to professionals who serve individuals from diverse cultures or those who have difficulty using the English language. It will be a valuable resource for school psychologists, special educators, speech and hearing specialists, rehabilitation counselors, as well as graduate-level students of school psychology and child and family psychology.







Raven's Progressive Matrices Rpm Practice Test


Book Description

Raven's Progressive Matrices or Raven's Matrices or RPM is a nonverbal group test typically used in educational settings. It is usually a 60-item test used in measuring abstract reasoning and regarded as a non-verbal estimate of intelligence or intelligence potential. It is the most common and popular test administered to groups ranging from 5-year-olds to the elderly. It is made of 60 multiple choice questions, listed in order of difficulty. It is used in education field (Gifted and Talented Education - GATE) evaluation and in work force evaluation. Raven's Matrices is commonly used for supervisory/entry level management positions and mid-level individual contributor positions. As a non-verbal measure, the test also provides a good measure of ability for individuals from different cultures because it is not influenced by language differences. This helps reduce cultural bias in your employee evaluations - an important benefit in today's multicultural society and global workforce.




Human Assessment and Cultural Factors


Book Description

Against the background of NATO's Istanbul conference of 1971 (Cronbach and Drenth, 1972), the Kingston conference shows that great progress has been made by the community of cross-cultural psychologists. The progress is as much in the psychology of the investigators as in the investigations being reported. In 1971 the investigators were mostly strangers to each other. Behind their reports lay radically different field experiences, disparate research traditions, and mutually contradictory social ideals. Istanbul was not a Tower of Babel, but participants did speak past each other. Now a community exists, thanks to the meetings of NATO and the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, to flourishing journals, and the Triandis et a1. (1980) Handbook. The members tend to know each other, can anticipate how their formu lations will fallon the ears of others, and accept superficially divergent approaches as making up a collective enterprise. Ten years ago there was open conflict between those who con fronted exotic peoples with traditional tests and applied tradi tional interpretations to the responses, and the relativists who insisted that tasks, test taking, and interpretation cannot be "standardized" in the ways that matter. Today's investigators are conscious of the need to revalidate tasks carried into alien settings; they often prefer to redesign the mode of presentation and to attune the subject to test taking. They face the diffi culties squarely and recognize that even the best means of coping are only partially successful.