The Distribution of Flight Tracks Across Air Combat Command Military Training Routes


Book Description

To validate the flight track dispersion algorithms currently in the ROUTEMAP and MR_NMAP noise models, measurements of the lateral distribution of flight operations were conducted on five low-altitude Military Training (MTRs). This distribution defines the spread in aircraft position across the width of the route. Included were three instrument routes and two visual routes having various widths and flight operation characteristics. Two methods were used to determine the distribution on the MTRs; acoustic measurements and radar tracking. The first method used a linear array of noise monitors, spanning the width of the route, to record overflight noise levels and thus estimate the aircraft position along the array. Due to limitations with this procedure, radar tracking was used as an alternate method The results, using both methods, indicate that flight tracks are distributed across MTRs in Gaussian form and the standard deviation of tracks is generally proportional to the route width. These findings support the results of previous studies which were used to develop the flight track dispersion algorithms. A recommendation has been made to formally adopt these algorithms for use in both models.




The Distribution of Flight Tracks Across TAC VFR Military Training Routes


Book Description

Noise measurements were performed on five VFR Military Training Routes. The objective was to determine the lateral distribution of operations across these routes, in order to validate or update the structure of the ROUTEMAP noise prediction model. It was found that distribution of operations about the centerline is Gaussian, as embodied in the current version of ROUTEMAP. It has been established from the current measurements that the standard deviation of flight tracks is generally 0.17 times the route width. This dispersion is due to a combination of (a) missions using a variety of nominal tracks and (b) the variation inherent in visual navigation. In situations where there is only one nominal track (route width less than 6 nautical miles, choke points, or specific local conditions), the standard deviation is one nautical mile. Recommendations are made for revisions to ROUTEMAP to incorporate these new results. Aircraft noise, Military aircraft operations, Community noise exposure.







Military Training Routes


Book Description













Command Of The Air


Book Description

In the pantheon of air power spokesmen, Giulio Douhet holds center stage. His writings, more often cited than perhaps actually read, appear as excerpts and aphorisms in the writings of numerous other air power spokesmen, advocates-and critics. Though a highly controversial figure, the very controversy that surrounds him offers to us a testimonial of the value and depth of his work, and the need for airmen today to become familiar with his thought. The progressive development of air power to the point where, today, it is more correct to refer to aerospace power has not outdated the notions of Douhet in the slightest In fact, in many ways, the kinds of technological capabilities that we enjoy as a global air power provider attest to the breadth of his vision. Douhet, together with Hugh “Boom” Trenchard of Great Britain and William “Billy” Mitchell of the United States, is justly recognized as one of the three great spokesmen of the early air power era. This reprint is offered in the spirit of continuing the dialogue that Douhet himself so perceptively began with the first edition of this book, published in 1921. Readers may well find much that they disagree with in this book, but also much that is of enduring value. The vital necessity of Douhet’s central vision-that command of the air is all important in modern warfare-has been proven throughout the history of wars in this century, from the fighting over the Somme to the air war over Kuwait and Iraq.







A Concise History of the U.S. Air Force


Book Description

Except in a few instances, since World War II no American soldier or sailor has been attacked by enemy air power. Conversely, no enemy soldier orsailor has acted in combat without being attacked or at least threatened by American air power. Aviators have brought the air weapon to bear against enemies while denying them the same prerogative. This is the legacy of the U.S. AirForce, purchased at great cost in both human and material resources.More often than not, aerial pioneers had to fight technological ignorance, bureaucratic opposition, public apathy, and disagreement over purpose.Every step in the evolution of air power led into new and untrodden territory, driven by humanitarian impulses; by the search for higher, faster, and farther flight; or by the conviction that the air way was the best way. Warriors have always coveted the high ground. If technology permitted them to reach it, men, women andan air force held and exploited it-from Thomas Selfridge, first among so many who gave that "last full measure of devotion"; to Women's Airforce Service Pilot Ann Baumgartner, who broke social barriers to become the first Americanwoman to pilot a jet; to Benjamin Davis, who broke racial barriers to become the first African American to command a flying group; to Chuck Yeager, a one-time non-commissioned flight officer who was the first to exceed the speed of sound; to John Levitow, who earned the Medal of Honor by throwing himself over a live flare to save his gunship crew; to John Warden, who began a revolution in air power thought and strategy that was put to spectacular use in the Gulf War.Industrialization has brought total war and air power has brought the means to overfly an enemy's defenses and attack its sources of power directly. Americans have perceived air power from the start as a more efficient means of waging war and as a symbol of the nation's commitment to technology to master challenges, minimize casualties, and defeat adversaries.