The Documentation of Clinical Psychotropic Drug Trails
Author : Thomas H. McGlashan
Publisher :
Page : 146 pages
File Size : 16,27 MB
Release : 1973
Category : Drugs
ISBN :
Author : Thomas H. McGlashan
Publisher :
Page : 146 pages
File Size : 16,27 MB
Release : 1973
Category : Drugs
ISBN :
Author : National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.). Psychopharmacology Research Branch
Publisher :
Page : 140 pages
File Size : 15,64 MB
Release : 1973
Category : Antidepressants
ISBN :
Author : National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)
Publisher :
Page : 198 pages
File Size : 24,35 MB
Release : 1973
Category : Antidepressants
ISBN :
Author : National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.). Psychopharmacology Research Branch
Publisher :
Page : 140 pages
File Size : 22,1 MB
Release : 1973
Category : Psychopharmacology
ISBN :
Author : National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)
Publisher :
Page : 196 pages
File Size : 43,54 MB
Release : 1973
Category :
ISBN :
Author : Institute of Medicine
Publisher : National Academies Press
Page : 151 pages
File Size : 40,11 MB
Release : 2010-10-22
Category : Medical
ISBN : 0309163358
An ideal health care system relies on efficiently generating timely, accurate evidence to deliver on its promise of diminishing the divide between clinical practice and research. There are growing indications, however, that the current health care system and the clinical research that guides medical decisions in the United States falls far short of this vision. The process of generating medical evidence through clinical trials in the United States is expensive and lengthy, includes a number of regulatory hurdles, and is based on a limited infrastructure. The link between clinical research and medical progress is also frequently misunderstood or unsupported by both patients and providers. The focus of clinical research changes as diseases emerge and new treatments create cures for old conditions. As diseases evolve, the ultimate goal remains to speed new and improved medical treatments to patients throughout the world. To keep pace with rapidly changing health care demands, clinical research resources need to be organized and on hand to address the numerous health care questions that continually emerge. Improving the overall capacity of the clinical research enterprise will depend on ensuring that there is an adequate infrastructure in place to support the investigators who conduct research, the patients with real diseases who volunteer to participate in experimental research, and the institutions that organize and carry out the trials. To address these issues and better understand the current state of clinical research in the United States, the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) Forum on Drug Discovery, Development, and Translation held a 2-day workshop entitled Transforming Clinical Research in the United States. The workshop, summarized in this volume, laid the foundation for a broader initiative of the Forum addressing different aspects of clinical research. Future Forum plans include further examining regulatory, administrative, and structural barriers to the effective conduct of clinical research; developing a vision for a stable, continuously funded clinical research infrastructure in the United States; and considering strategies and collaborative activities to facilitate more robust public engagement in the clinical research enterprise.
Author : National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Publisher : National Academies Press
Page : 111 pages
File Size : 45,64 MB
Release : 2016-11-07
Category : Medical
ISBN : 0309442583
On March 3-4, 2016, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's Forum on Neuroscience and Nervous System Disorders held a workshop in Washington, DC, bringing together key stakeholders to discuss opportunities for improving the integrity, efficiency, and validity of clinical trials for nervous system disorders. Participants in the workshop represented a range of diverse perspectives, including individuals not normally associated with traditional clinical trials. The purpose of this workshop was to generate discussion about not only what is feasible now, but what may be possible with the implementation of cutting-edge technologies in the future.
Author : Joseph F. Goldberg
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
Page : 611 pages
File Size : 14,91 MB
Release : 2021-04-29
Category : Medical
ISBN : 1108450741
A practical guide translating clinical trials findings, across major psychiatric disorders, to devise tailored, evidence-based treatments.
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 850 pages
File Size : 10,25 MB
Release : 1974
Category : Psychopharmacology
ISBN :
Author : Institute of Medicine
Publisher : National Academies Press
Page : 279 pages
File Size : 50,53 MB
Release : 1995-03-14
Category : Medical
ISBN : 0309176611
In June 1993 a clinical trial of fialuridine (FIAU), a promising new medication for hepatitis B, was abruptly terminated when one of the 15 out-patients participating in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) study was suddenly hospitalized with liver failure. Although all the remaining patients were contacted and told to stop taking their medication, six more subsequently developed severe toxicity. Five patients died, and two others were probably saved from death only by having liver transplants. In response to a request from the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, the IOM committee has analyzed the FIAU clinical trials, making recommendations for additional safeguards for the conduct of future clinical trials. This evaluation included the review of documents pertaining to investigational new drug submissions, protocols and consent forms from other clinical trials, as well as information available from other clinical and preclinical experience with compounds related to FIAU and its parent drug, fiacitibine (FIAC), which is metabolized to FIAU. The committee does not seek to affix responsibility for the adverse outcome of this NIH trial, but instead focuses on whether any rules or procedures governing the clinical trials process itself need to be changed, and if so, what burdens or costs such changes might place on future clinical trials.