The Effect of Agricultural Productivity on Economic Growth in Nigeria


Book Description

The crucial role agricultural productivity plays in the overall development of a nation cannot be overemphasized. It is not only seen as a key to poverty reduction and vehicle for promoting equity, fairness and social justice but also helps to supply the essential economic ingredients which are necessary condition for sustained economic growth. Thus, enhancing effective investment on the agricultural sector in order to boost its capacity has been a tenet of growth and development strategies of most developed countries. The basic objective of this work is to carry out an empirical investigation on the effect of agricultural productivity on economic growth in Nigeria, using annual time series data from 2000 to 2014. The paper employs the Ordinary Least Square (OLS) method. Empirical results indicate that there is, indeed a long-run relationship between agricultural productivity and economic growth. All the variables including, the GDP contribution of the agricultural sector, gross expenditure on agriculture and gross access to bank (agricultural) loans/credit had the expected positive signs in the Nigerian economy and were also tested in relation to economic growth by using the Pearson correlation co-efficient. The findings have a strong implication on agricultural policy in Nigeria. The study suggest that a concerted effort should be made by policy makers to concentrate on the productivity of the agricultural sector in order to boost its production capacity, which would enhance productivity of output and in turn stimulates economic growth.







Variability in agricultural productivity and rural household consumption inequality: Evidence from Nigeria and Uganda


Book Description

This paper uses multiple rounds of household survey panel data to assess the distributional implications of variability in agricultural productivity in Nigeria and Uganda. It uses both a conventional decomposition and a regression-based inequality decomposition to estimate the impact of climate-induced variability in agricultural productivity. To mitigate the endogeneity associated with unobserved time-invariant and time-variant household fixed effects, we use rainfall shocks as a proxy for estimating the exogenous variability in agricultural productivity that affects consumption. Results suggest that a 10 percent increase in the variability of agricultural productivity tends to decrease household consumption by 38 and 52 percent on average for Nigeria and Uganda, respectively. Controlling for other factors, variability in agricultural productivity contributed to between 25 and 43 percent of consumption inequality between 2010 and 2015 for Nigeria; and 16 and 31 percent of consumption inequality between 2009 and 2011 for Uganda. We also show that variability in agricultural productivity increases changes in consumption inequality over time.




Impact of Agricultural Sector on Economic Growth in Nigeria


Book Description

This study examined the impact of agricultural sector on economic growth in Nigeria (1981-2020). The main objective of the study is to examine the impact of agricultural sector on economic growth in Nigeria. The study used multiple regressions. The variables under consideration were real gross domestic product as the dependent variable while crop production, livestock production, forestry production and fish production are the independent variables. The Ordinary Least Square (OLS) technique was used in estimating the relationship between the dependent and independent variables. The research result Crop production and livestock production have significant impacts on economic growth in Nigeria. Forestry production and fish production have no significant impacts on economic growth in Nigeria. All the independent variables have positive relationship with economic growth in Nigeria respectively, which implies that as crop production, livestock production, forestry production, and fish production increases, real gross domestic product increase. There is no causality relationship between crop production and economic growth in Nigeria. There is no causality relationship between livestock production and economic growth in Nigeria. There is a unidirectional causality relationship flowing from forestry production to real gross domestic product, between forestry production and economic growth in Nigeria. There is no causality relationship between fish production and economic growth in Nigeria. Based on the findings of the work, the study recommends that there is the need for the Nigerian government and its citizenry to concentrate their combined efforts towards increasing the productivity capacity of the crops with the aim of promoting food security and economic growth among others.




The Balance Between Industry and Agriculture in Economic Development


Book Description

This volume of papers from the Eighth World Congress deals with changes in proportions and growth rates of sectors of the economy in relation to economic development. It includes a survey of theories of sectoral balance and studies of structural transformation in the Kuznets traditon.







The role of agriculture in reducing child undernutrition in Nigeria


Book Description

This study examines the effect of agricultural productivity change on child nutritional outcomes in Nigeria. Using several waves of micro-level panel data from Nigeria, we first show that high temperature (heat stress) reduces agricultural productivity change. A one percent increase in high temperatures during the crop growth period result in a 4 percent decrease in agricultural productivity. More importantly, our analysis provides several important insights on the implications of agricultural productivity change for reducing child undernutrition. The results show that agricultural productivity growth has a positive effect on child nutritional outcomes, measured by child height-for-age and weight-for-age. The main channel through which agricultural productivity growth affects child nutritional outcomes is by increasing food production for own household consumption. This suggests that productivity-enhancing investments in the agricultural sector could have a direct impact on child nutritional outcomes among smallholder households in Nigeria. The results also show that agricultural productivity change has higher impact for households who have better access to markets and a higher educational level. Interventions and policies geared towards intensification of agricultural production need to be complemented with strategies for widening educational programs and improving farmers’ access to markets. to induce incentives for increased production.




Effects of Public Expenditures on Agriculture at Subnational Levels on Households’ Welfare and Economic Resilience in Nigeria


Book Description

Agricultural development has long been considered an important driver of overall economic development in developing countries such as Nigeria. Whether increasing public expenditures on agriculture (PEA) can directly improve broad dimensions of household well-being has continued to be debated. In addition, there has been growing interest in the economic flexibility of households to switch between nonfarm and farming activities. Such flexibility can potentially enhance the resilience of households to shocks like the COVID-19 pandemic in today’s rapidly changing socioeconomic environments. Direct evidence of the impact of PEA on broad development outcomes is also important in informing regional initiatives aiming to use PEA as an instrument for overall food security enhancement and poverty reduction in Africa. Using state- and local government area (LGA)-level PEA figures and household data in Nigeria, this study aims to provide initial evidence at the household level in Nigeria. The findings suggest that greater PEA shares have positive effects on various development outcomes at the household level, including consumption, poverty reduction, nonfarm capital investments, and household dietary diversity. The findings also suggest that greater PEA shares are likely to help farm households enhance their economic flexibility. These findings are consistent with the hypotheses of positive linkages between PEA and agricultural outcomes, and linkages between agricultural and nonagricultural outcomes, often advocated in the literature. PEA should be increased by increasing its share of total public expenditures through conscious efforts to reallocate existing resources, rather than trying to increase it by increasing the overall size of public expenditures. Furthermore, it remains important to identify the appropriate sources (for example, spending by LGA or state) and types of PEA (for example, recurrent or capital spending) for particular development outcomes.




Decentralization and Economic Development in Nigeria


Book Description

This is the only book of its kind to address the effect of agricultural decentralization on the Nigerian national economy. In his effort to demonstrate how decentralization promotes development that can economically empower individuals, Uwadibie thoroughly analyzes three key aspects of Nigeria's decentralization policy. These are the Local Government Reform Act of 1976, the creation of new states, and the implementation of the Structural Adjustment Program (SAP). Together, these policies reduced the overall role of the federal government in the national economy by diverting revenue to states and dissolving the federal government's direct ownership of agricultural enterprises. Based on his extensive research, Uwadibie concludes by making a number of additional policy recommendations that he believes are essential for Nigeria to become self-sufficient in food production. Those with an interest in African studies, economic development, or agricultural production will find much to their liking in this work.




The Effects of Trade and Exchange Rate Policies on Agriculture in Nigeria


Book Description

Focuses on the effects of Nigeria's trade and exchange rate policies on agricultural incentives especially during the 1970s, the period of the oil boom. Attempts to determine the degree of protection granted to agriculture compared with other sectors, and assesses how these policies affected the allocation of resources both within agriculture and among the other sectors.