The Effects of Using Writing-to-learn-mathematics Strategies to Improve Student Achievement in Mathematics


Book Description

The purpose of this study was to determine if incorporating writing-to-learn strategies into the math curriculum would increase student achievement and motivation in math and decreases in students' math anxiety Students involved in this eight-week study came from student pre- and postsurveys, pre- and posttests over our first math unit, ans student journals. Writing-to-learn activities such as math autobiographies, quick-writes, problem solving and a variety of other writing prompts were assigned 2 times per week. All subjects showed a mean increase of 24 points out of the 41 points possible on the post test. The data collected demonstrated the benefit of using writing to learn strategies to give explanations and mathematical reasoning for answers.




The Effects of Using Writing in the Math Classroom on Student Achievement in Math


Book Description

The demands of local, state, and national mandates on the classroom teacher became overwhelming to me. I decided that it must be possible to work towards several goals without doing several tasks. As a result, I implemented writing would affect student achievement. The study was implemented with 22 pre-calculus students during the first nine-week term of 2007-2008 school year at Benton Community Schools. Existing student attitudes towards math were assessed with a survey at the beginning of the study and reassessed at the conclusion of the study. A pretest of pre-calculus concepts was given at the beginning and at the conclusion of the study. Questions were split between skill-based questions, which required a numeric response, and conceptual-based questions, which required a numeric response, and conceptual-based questions, which required a written explanation. Students also wrote in a journal an average of two times per week. Two formal writing assignments were also given throughout the nine-week study. Results showed an increase in the number of students showing a positive attitude towards math along with an increase in student achievement. These results may be due to the implementation of writing in the mathematic curriculum.




Writing to Learn Mathematics


Book Description

Explains how writing can be integrated into primary and secondary mathematics, and suggests topics and methods, including journals, learning logs, and letters.







The Effects of Reading and Writing Strategies to Improve Fluency in Mathematics


Book Description

The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSS-M) initiative and its implications have caused teachers to examine students' growth and their development through multiple lenses. The CCSS-M has included reasoning and communicating as essential standards for teaching and learning. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of teaching reading and writing strategies in a mathematics classroom as a means to improve students' mathematical fluency. Additionally, an interview was conducted to reveal students' attitude towards the CCSS for Mathematics. This study was conducted in an eighth grade math intervention classroom that is designed for students who received low math scores on the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT). The sample consisted of 15 student-participants, the treatment group is comprised of eight students, and the control group is comprised of seven students. The teacher researcher implemented five reading strategies and two writing strategies to the treatment group while the control group received no instructional strategies. A pre-test and a post-test were administered to both groups and scores were used for comparison. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to test the effectiveness of the strategies. The result of the ANOVA test indicated that there was a statistically significant difference between the treatment and the control groups. The strategies had a positive outcome on the students' performances. The treatment group made significant gains on their post-test compared to the control group. Based on the results of this study and students' attitude towards the CCSS-M, it can be concluded that incorporating the reading and writing strategies in the mathematics curriculum is beneficial and can improve one's conceptual understanding in mathematics.




Writing to Learn


Book Description

This is an essential book for everyone who wants to write clearly about any subject and use writing as a means of learning.




Learning Mathematics Successfully


Book Description

The goal of this book is to bring together the concept of self-efficacy theory with practical how-to strategies for both teachers and parents to use in heightening their students’ levels of self-efficacy. The book examines how self-efficacy theory relates to the acquisition of mathematical competence. The text also provides specific and practical how-to strategies for both teachers and parents in applying these principles to classroom mathematics instruction and activities. The self-efficacy practices and applications to mathematics are also suitable for families working with learners outside the school environment. Acquiring mathematical skills requires more than knowing arithmetic tables, memorizing rules, and knowing proofs. It requires a basic belief that one is capable of obtaining this information, making sense of it, and applying and generalizing it in mathematical problems. In addition, a student must believe that obtaining these skills leads to a positive outcome, whether it is perceived to be a good or passing grade, comfort-level in tackling mathematical problems, being able to advance to the next mathematics course, being able to score highly on the math section of the SAT and/or be competitive for a desired job. The ability of students to achieve and exceed grade level competence in mathematics is addressed through the lens of Albert Bandura’s Self-Efficacy Theory. This theoretical position states that one will persist in mastering a behavior (in this case, mastering mathematical principles and skills), in the face of obstacles or failures—to the extent that one believes he or she has the ability to do so, and that there is a desired outcome for doing so. The research literature on the role of self-efficacy in mathematic instruction is examined to demonstrate the validity of using this concept to increase student (and parent/teacher) confidence in learning and applying grade-appropriate math content. Specific teaching methodologies will be provided that infuse self-efficacy strategies for students. Lastly, teachers and parents are provided strategies to increase their own self-efficacy when it comes to conveying mathematics principles to their child or student, as well as strategies to assess their students’ level of self-efficacy over time. Teaching and learning mathematics so that students achieve success at their grade level or above can present a variety of challenges. One barrier that affects learners is the belief that one is not capable of learning mathematics or not naturally talented in the field, not a “math person.” As a result, learners may not believe they are capable of a positive outcome for achieving mathematics success. This book is an important resource for pre-service and in-service teachers, as well as families in applying the theory of self-efficacy to support learners in becoming confident and assured in their ability to understand and apply mathematical principles and procedures. Coupled with classroom ready mathematics instructional strategies, the book provides readers with the background, tools and strategies needed to carry content success and confidence forward to remain persistent in solving all future mathematical problems.




Visible Learning for Mathematics, Grades K-12


Book Description

Selected as the Michigan Council of Teachers of Mathematics winter book club book! Rich tasks, collaborative work, number talks, problem-based learning, direct instruction...with so many possible approaches, how do we know which ones work the best? In Visible Learning for Mathematics, six acclaimed educators assert it’s not about which one—it’s about when—and show you how to design high-impact instruction so all students demonstrate more than a year’s worth of mathematics learning for a year spent in school. That’s a high bar, but with the amazing K-12 framework here, you choose the right approach at the right time, depending upon where learners are within three phases of learning: surface, deep, and transfer. This results in "visible" learning because the effect is tangible. The framework is forged out of current research in mathematics combined with John Hattie’s synthesis of more than 15 years of education research involving 300 million students. Chapter by chapter, and equipped with video clips, planning tools, rubrics, and templates, you get the inside track on which instructional strategies to use at each phase of the learning cycle: Surface learning phase: When—through carefully constructed experiences—students explore new concepts and make connections to procedural skills and vocabulary that give shape to developing conceptual understandings. Deep learning phase: When—through the solving of rich high-cognitive tasks and rigorous discussion—students make connections among conceptual ideas, form mathematical generalizations, and apply and practice procedural skills with fluency. Transfer phase: When students can independently think through more complex mathematics, and can plan, investigate, and elaborate as they apply what they know to new mathematical situations. To equip students for higher-level mathematics learning, we have to be clear about where students are, where they need to go, and what it looks like when they get there. Visible Learning for Math brings about powerful, precision teaching for K-12 through intentionally designed guided, collaborative, and independent learning.







Effects of Writing in the Mathematics Classroom


Book Description

Writing in the subject matter is widely supported by authors and professional organizations. For example, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) lists communication, including writing, as an essential part of mathematics education in their Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (2000). The NCTM also states that students can use communications with peers, teachers, and others to organize and consolidate their mathematical thinking. In addition, effective classroom communications provide students with the opportunity to review, analyze, and evaluate the mathematical thinking and strategies of others so that mathematical ideas can be expressed more precisely. Similarly, Sutton and Krueger (2003) believe that reading and writing should be combined with mathematics at all times, and go on to state that the importance of writing in the mathematics classroom cannot be overemphasized. Aside from helping students to clarify their understanding of mathematics and improve their communications skills, writing also helps students to organize their ideas and thoughts more logically so that clear and coherent conclusions can be reached. The purpose of this study was to see if doing a significant amount of writing in a high school mathematics class will improve students' understanding of mathematical concepts. More specifically, the researcher wanted to know whether students gain more confidence and reduce their math phobia if asked to write about their difficulties and challenges when solving multistep problems and word problems. Additionally, this research focused on improving students' abilities to explain their reasoning behind required procedures. This study took place in a large urban high school in Connecticut. There were 51 participants of this study, all of them enrolled in Academic Geometry classes. Historically students in an academic track have been resistant when asked to explain their thinking and have avoided any kind of word problems. This investigation focused on students' attitude in math as well as their achievement. Although this study did not show any significant increase in grades on post-tests, students in the experimental group improved their ability to explain their reasoning behind required procedures and they gained more confidence when asked to solve word problems.