Book Description
A collection of essays, which outline the debates between James and Newman, Stephen and Sidgwick, et. al.
Author : Gerald D. McCarthy
Publisher :
Page : 264 pages
File Size : 37,4 MB
Release : 1986
Category : Philosophy
ISBN :
A collection of essays, which outline the debates between James and Newman, Stephen and Sidgwick, et. al.
Author : Sebastian Schmidt
Publisher : Routledge
Page : 279 pages
File Size : 11,72 MB
Release : 2020-04-03
Category : Philosophy
ISBN : 1000062007
This volume provides a framework for approaching and understanding mental normativity. It presents cutting-edge research on the ethics of belief as well as innovative research beyond the normativity of belief—and towards an ethics of mind. By moving beyond traditional issues of epistemology the contributors discuss the most current ideas revolving around rationality, responsibility, and normativity. The book’s chapters are divided into two main parts. Part I discusses contemporary issues surrounding the normativity of belief. The essays here cover topics such as control over belief and its implication for the ethics of belief, the role of the epistemic community for the possibility of epistemic normativity, responsibility for believing, doxastic partiality in friendship, the structure and content of epistemic norms, and the norms for suspension of judgment. In Part II the focus shifts from the practical dimensions of belief to the normativity and rationality of other mental states—especially blame, passing thoughts, fantasies, decisions, and emotions. These essays illustrate how we might approach an ethics of mind by focusing not only on belief, but also more generally on debates about responsibility and rationality, as well as on normative questions concerning other mental states or attitudes. The Ethics of Belief and Beyond paves the way towards an ethics of mind by building on and contributing to recent philosophical discussions in the ethics of belief and the normativity of other mental phenomena. It will be of interest to upper-level students and researchers working in epistemology, ethics, philosophy of action, philosophy of mind, and moral psychology.
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 8 pages
File Size : 39,3 MB
Release : 1876
Category :
ISBN :
Author : Rik Peels
Publisher : Oxford University Press
Page : 289 pages
File Size : 10,48 MB
Release : 2017
Category : Philosophy
ISBN : 0190608110
This book develops and defends a theory of responsible belief. The author argues that we lack control over our beliefs, but that we can nonetheless influence them. It is because we have intellectual obligations to influence our beliefs that we are responsible for them.
Author : Roe Fremstedal
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
Page : 295 pages
File Size : 50,67 MB
Release : 2022-02-17
Category : Philosophy
ISBN : 1316513769
A new perspective on Kierkegaard and his importance for historical and contemporary debates on self, ethics and religion.
Author : Gerald D. McCarthy
Publisher :
Page : 262 pages
File Size : 49,97 MB
Release : 1986
Category : Philosophy
ISBN :
A collection of essays, which outline the debates between James and Newman, Stephen and Sidgwick, et. al.
Author : Robert K. Garcia
Publisher : Rowman & Littlefield
Page : 229 pages
File Size : 35,35 MB
Release : 2009
Category : Philosophy
ISBN : 0742551709
"Morality and religion: intimately wed, violently opposed, or something else? Discussion of this issue appears in pop culture, the academy, and the media - often generating radically opposed views. At one end of the spectrum are those who think that unless God exists, ethics is unfounded and the moral life is unmotivated. At the other end are those who think that religious belief is unnecessary for - and even a threat to - ethical knowledge and the moral life." "This volume provides an accessible, charitable discussion that represents a range of views along this spectrum. The book begins with a lively debate between Paul Kurtz and William Lane Craig on the question, Is goodness without God good enough? Kurtz defends the affirmative position and Craig the negative. Following the debate are new essays by prominent scholars. These essays comment on the debate and advance the broader discussion of religion and morality. The book closes with final responses from Kurtz and Craig."--BOOK JACKET.
Author : Christopher Heath Wellman
Publisher : OUP USA
Page : 350 pages
File Size : 12,17 MB
Release : 2011-09-30
Category : Philosophy
ISBN : 0199731721
Do states have the right to prevent potential immigrants from crossing their borders, or should people have the freedom to migrate and settle wherever they wish? Christopher Heath Wellman and Phillip Cole develop and defend opposing answers to this timely and important question. Appealing to the right to freedom of association, Wellman contends that legitimate states have broad discretion to exclude potential immigrants, even those who desperately seek to enter. Against this, Cole argues that the commitment to the moral equality of all human beings - which legitimate states can be expected to hold - means national borders must be open: equal respect requires equal access, both to territory and membership; and that the idea of open borders is less radical than it seems when we consider how many territorial and community boundaries have this open nature. In addition to engaging with each other's arguments, Wellman and Cole address a range of central questions and prominent positions on this topic. The authors therefore provide a critical overview of the major contributions to the ethics of migration, as well as developing original, provocative positions of their own.
Author : John Bishop
Publisher : Oxford University Press
Page : 263 pages
File Size : 46,63 MB
Release : 2007-04-12
Category : Philosophy
ISBN : 019920554X
Does our available evidence show that some particular religion is correct? It seems unlikely, given the great diversity of religious - and non-religious - views of the world. But if no religious beliefs can be shown true on the evidence, can it be right to make a religious commitment? Should people make 'leaps of faith'? Or would we all be better off avoiding commitments that outrun our evidence? And, if leaps of faith can be acceptable, how do we tell the difference between goodand bad ones - between sound religion and dogmatic ideology or fundamentalist fanaticism? Believing by Faith offers answers to these questions, inspired by a famous attempt to justify faith made by William James in 1896. In doing so, it engages critically with much recent discussion in the philosophyof religion, and, especially, the epistemology of religious belief.
Author : Anthony Robert Booth
Publisher : Springer
Page : 108 pages
File Size : 44,62 MB
Release : 2016-08-04
Category : Philosophy
ISBN : 1137557001
In this book the author argues that the Falasifa, the Philosophers of the Islamic Golden Age, are usefully interpreted through the prism of the contemporary, western ethics of belief. He contends that their position amounts to what he calls ‘Moderate Evidentialism’ – that only for the epistemic elite what one ought to believe is determined by one’s evidence. The author makes the case that the Falasifa’s position is well argued, ingeniously circumvents issues in the epistemology of testimony, and is well worth taking seriously in the contemporary debate. He reasons that this is especially the case since the position has salutary consequences for how to respond to the sceptic, and for how we are to conceive of extremist belief.