European Deterrence Initiative


Book Description

Funding for EDI has supported a variety of military activities in Europe, including troop rotations, intelligence activities, and construction of projects such as airfields, ranges, and other military facilities. This report examines: (1) how, if at all, EDI has changed U.S. military posture in Europe; (2) DOD’s efforts to define and report on its funding for EDI; and (3) the extent to which DOD uses performance information to evaluate EDI activities and justify dedicated resources. GAO is recommending that the Secretary of Defense ensure that the commander of the U.S. European Command, in collaboration with the heads of the military services, establishes performance goals and measures for EDI and its five lines of effort.




The European Defence Initiative


Book Description




The Emergence of EU Defense Research Policy


Book Description

This book explores European security and defense R&D policy, unveiling the strategic, industrial, institutional and ideational sources of the European Commission’s military research initiative. Starting from a well-defined empirical epicentre—the rise of non-civilian R&D priorities in the European Union—this book covers interrelated themes and topics such as approaches to arms production and R&D collaboration relationships between European R&D-related institutions technology and research foundations of European security policy past and present European armament collaborations transatlantic R&D collaboration the militarization of border security. Divided into 5 sections, the enclosed chapters explore the EU technology and innovation policy in regards to security, industrial competitiveness and military capabilities. The terrorist attacks in the US on September 11, 2001 provided a window of opportunity for the introduction of security as a distinct European R&D priority. In fact, since 2002, the Preparatory Action for Security Research (PASR) has funded 45 million euros to 39 research consortia to conduct security R&D. While the idea of pooling defense research efforts and programmes in Europe is not new, the establishment of institutions like the European Defense Agency (EDA) are a major step into institutionalizing European agencies involvement in supporting defense technology research. It is against this backdrop of policy developments that this book is positioned, in addition to addressing some of the political, economic, industrial and philosophical questions that arise. Featuring contributions from a variety of academic fields and industries, this book will be of interest to scholars, researchers, students and policy makers in the fields of security policy, international relations, innovation, European studies and military studies.




European Defense and the Future of Transatlantic Cooperation


Book Description

Discusses the need to restructure European security organizations and to strengthen economic and political unity.




European Deterrence Initiative


Book Description

The illegal annexation of Crimea by Russia in March 2014 marked a crucial moment for European, transatlantic and international security. Acting like a wake-up call, this event redefined strategic and security considerations in individual EU Member States, in the United States and in international organisations such as the European Union (EU) and the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). Russia's increasingly assertive military posture is unsettling for its European neighbours. Four years ago, in June 2014, US President Obama announced what was to become a key security guarantee from America to Europe. The European Reassurance Initiative, as it was called during the first half of its existence, is a military programme supporting the activities of the US military and its allies in Europe. In 2017, it was renamed the European Deterrence Initiative (EDI) to reflect the shift in the international security environment characterised by a prioritisation of deterrence. Activities under the EDI include training of forces, multinational military exercises and development of military equipment and capabilities. They all take place under the umbrella of Operation Atlantic Resolve (OAR) whose core mission is to enhance deterrence. Despite recent turmoil in transatlantic relations, the budget for building up defences in central and eastern Europe through the EDI has seen major increases; even under the Trump administration. The EDI has deepened security and defence cooperation between the US and the main beneficiaries of OAR, namely Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Romania. The US European Command, which coordinates all EDI and OAR activities, is working to forge enhanced interoperability between different countries' military forces through joint training, staff exchanges and exercises. The Command's leadership also recognises the cyber domain as a pressing area where integration is needed, although the EDI budget for 2019 makes no mention of it. The recen tproliferation of EU defence initiatives and the revamp of EU-NATO relations should also contribute to EDI' score mission: to establish a strong deterrence posture able to meet today's security challenges.




Star Wars and European Defence


Book Description




European Security Defense Policy - Why the U.S. Needs to Support


Book Description

In December 1999, the leaders of the 15-nation European Union (EU) endorsed a plan to develop an independent military force within three years. This plan is part of a bid by Europe's most stable and affluent democracies to assume a greater role in security responsibilities on the continent. Referred to initially as the European Security Defense Initiative (ESDI), this plan, now called the European Security Defense Policy (ESDP), includes an initiative to build a European crisis-response force of up to 60,000 troops by no later than 2003. Initially, this program was hailed as a long-overdue program for the more affluent and stable European nations to assume more responsibility for their own security. However, this initiative is now a more controversial proposition than it seemed when first proposed. Some U.S. and other NATO leaders have voiced concerns that this initiative could erode the U.S.'s guaranteed presence and leadership on the European continent leading to potential instability in Europe. This paper will argue, that for both political and military reasons, the European Security Defense Policy should be fully embraced by the U.S. and the U.S. should continue to support the "separable but not separate" European defense entity remaining under the NATO umbrella. 1 Given the changing character of conflict on the European continent, this initiative will help ensure continued U.S. involvement in Europe stability, continue the viability of NATO in a changing security environment, and begin to develop a European defense capability needed for the changing environment in Europe.