THE HOLY QUR'AN (ARABIC/ENGLISH/LATIN)


Book Description







Holy Qur'An


Book Description

Intended for those who are unable to recite the holy Qur'an Arabic text, this title presents transliteration with Arabic text and English translation.




The Syro-Aramaic Reading of the Koran


Book Description

No Marketing Blurb




قرآن مجيد


Book Description

"By the Sheer grace and mercy of Allah the almighty under the blessed guidance of Ḥaḍrat Mirzā Masroor Ahmad, khalifatul masih Vaba, a soft-copy of the Arabic text of the Holy Qurʼan has been prepared using the indesign software, by the Nazarat Nashro Ishaʻat, Qadian, according to the script of the Yassarnal-Qurʼan formed by Hadrat Pir Manzur Muhammad. This task has been completed with a view to publish the translation of the Holy Qurʼan in numerous languages following the same pattern" --




Holy Qur'An


Book Description







The Glorious Qurán


Book Description




The Koran in English


Book Description

The untold story of how the Arabic Qur'an became the English Koran For millions of Muslims, the Qur'an is sacred only in Arabic, the original Arabic in which it was revealed to the Prophet Muhammad in the seventh century. To many Arab and non-Arab believers alike, the book literally defies translation, yet English translations are growing in both number and importance. Bruce Lawrence tells the remarkable story of the centuries-long quest to translate the Qur'an's lyrical verses—and to make English itself an Islamic language. A translation saga like no other, this panoramic book looks at cyber Korans, versions by feminist translators, and even a graphic Qur'an by the acclaimed visual artist Sandow Birk.




New Theory of the Holy Qur'an Translation: A Textbook for Advanced University Students of Linguistics and Translation


Book Description

Translation strategies are the procedures employed by the translator to attempt a solution to the multifarious baffling problems with which translation is indubitably replete. Malone (1988, p.78) defines translation The steps, selected from a consciously known range of potential procedures, taken to solve a translation problem, which has been consciously detected and resulting in a consciously applied solution. While some strategies are helpful, others turn out to be of little avail. It follows, then, that the translator has to sort out the wheat from the chaff in pursuit of a good translation. Here, the translator may utilize particular strategies in accordance with the method anticipated in the course of translation, i.e. target- orientedness or source- orientedness., Faced with differences in the extralinguistic reality of the two cultures or ist lexical mapping, the translator tries to reconcile them by relying on the following procedures: borrowing, definition, literal translation, substitution, lexical creation, omission, and addition. Three comments that need to be made by the researcher in connection with this list: First, not all of the procedures achieve cultural transfer in the sense of filling the gap, but they all serve the purpose of achieving communicative equivalence in translation. For instance, substitution and omission certainly do not help to make members of the target culture aware of anything that their culture does not already possess, and lexical creation is no more enlightening than the use of the sources – language expression unless accompanied by some other procedure that will make the particular extra-linguistic feature part of their experiences. Second, combinations of procedures rather than single procedures are required for optimum transmission of cultural information (e.g., borrowing –and- definition, borrowing-and- substitution, lexical creation-and- definition,) Third, in planning his/her translation strategy, the translator does not make a one-time decision on how he/she will treat unmatched elements of culture; rather, even if the translator has established an overall order of preferences, he/she usually makes a new decision for each element and for ist each use in an act of communication, rather, even if he has established an overall order of preferences, he usually makes a new decision for each such element and for each use in an act of communication .(Cohen,1990,p.78)