Book Description

The purpose of this study was to determine the superintendent's role in contract negotiations of the collective bargaining process. The study explored role identification, leadership identification, elements of a "best practice" model and the effect of contract negotiations on the professional responsibilities of public school superintendent. The methodology used was a qualitative research instrument. A phenomenology research design was used. The participants were 10 superintendents from Southwestern Illinois. The participants were selected based on availability and willingness. The interview process consisted of 10 questions. The study was conducted while I was involved in a contract negotiation. Personal observations were a part of the findings. The findings were as follows: A superintendent should be involved in the negotiation process as a "facilitator." The leadership of the superintendent can be harmed by his/her participation in contract negotiations. If the superintendent is directly involved in contract negotiations it can have a negative effect on his/her role responsibilities. The superintendent can limit this negative effect by being open, honest and approachable during contract negotiations. The biggest challenge facing superintendents is money related to financing schools. The "best practice" model for a school district involved in contract negotiations is the employment of a professional negotiator.