The NLRB Recess Appointments


Book Description




Recess Appointment Power


Book Description

Under the Appointments Clause, the US President is empowered to nominate and appoint principal officers of the United States, but only with the advice and consent of the Senate. In addition to this general appointment authority, the Recess Appointments Clause permits the President to make temporary appointments, without Senate approval, during periods in which the Senate is not in session. This book begins with a general legal overview of the Recess Appointments Clause and a discussion of applicable case law that existed prior to the D.C. Circuits decision in Noel Canning.




The NLRB Recess Appointments


Book Description




The Nlrb Recess Appointments


Book Description

The NLRB recess appointments : implications for America's workers and employers : hearing before the Committee on Education and the Workforce, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, second session, hearing held in Washington, DC, February 7, 2012.




Crs Report for Congress


Book Description

Under the Appointments Clause, the President is empowered to nominate and appoint principal officers of the United States, but only with the advice and consent of the Senate. In addition to this general appointment authority, the Recess Appointments Clause permits the President to make temporary appointments, without Senate approval, during periods in which the Senate is not in session. On January 4, 2012, while the Senate was holding periodic "pro forma" sessions, President Obama invoked his recess appointment power and unilaterally appointed Richard Cordray as Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and Terrence F. Flynn, Sharon Block, and Richard F. Griffin Jr. as Members of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The President's recess appointments were ultimately challenged by parties affected by actions taken by the appointed officials, and on January 25, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) became the first court to evaluate the merits of the President's appointments. In a broad decision entitled Noel Canning v. National Labor Relations Board, the court invalidated the appointment of all three NLRB Board Members. In reaching its decision, the D.C. Circuit concluded that under the Recess Appointments Clause, the President may ...







An Introduction to Constitutional Law


Book Description

An Introduction to Constitutional Law teaches the narrative of constitutional law as it has developed historically and provides the essential background to understand how this foundational body of law has come to be what it is today. This multimedia experience combines a book and video series to engage students more directly in the study of constitutional law. All students—even those unfamiliar with American history—will garner a firm understanding of how constitutional law has evolved. An eleven-hour online video library brings the Supreme Court’s most important decisions to life. Videos are enriched by photographs, maps, and audio from the Supreme Court. The book and videos are accessible for all levels: law school, college, high school, home school, and independent study. Students can read and watch these materials before class to prepare for lectures or study after class to fill in any gaps in their notes. And, come exam time, students can binge-watch the entire canon of constitutional law in about twelve hours.




The Future of the NLRB: What Noel Canning Vs. NLRB Means for Workers, Employers, and Unions


Book Description

A year ago, President Obama installed three recess appointments to the board while Congress was meeting regularly in pro forma session. A U.S. federal appeals court ruled in Noel Canning v. NLRB that these so-called recess appointments are unconstitutional. The power of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) affects almost every private workplace. The board has recently taken steps to skew the balance of power even further toward union leaders. For example, the board is making it increasingly difficult for employers to investigate possible misconduct and employee complaints. In Banner Health and Piedmont Gardens, the board restricted the ability to keep internal investigations confidential while allowing unions to obtain sensitive statements provided by witnesses. The board has also begun chipping away at the right of workers not to fund union lobbying. In 1988, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Communications Workers v. Beck that workers forced to pay union dues do not have to finance a union's political activities. The rights of workers, as well as the opinion of the nation's highest court, are being eviscerated by an activist labor board. Today's NLRB will go to great lengths to undermine employers, marginalize workers, and empower Big Labor.