The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974


Book Description

This study of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) explains in detail how public officials in the executive branch and Congress overcame strong opposition from business and organized labor to pass landmark legislation regulating employer-sponsored retirement and health plans. Before Congress passed ERISA, federal law gave employers and unions great discretion in the design and operation of employee benefit plans. Most importantly, firms and unions could and often did establish pension plans that placed employees at great risk for not receiving any retirement benefits. In the early 1960s, officials in the executive branch proposed a number of regulatory initiatives to protect employees, but business groups and most labor unions objected to the key proposals. Faced with opposition from powerful interest groups, legislative entrepreneurs in Congress, chiefly New York Republican senator Jacob K. Javits, took the case for pension reform directly to voters by publicizing frightening statistics and "horror stories" about pension plans. This deft and successful effort to mobilize the media and public opinion overwhelmed the business community and organized labor and persuaded Javits's colleagues in Congress to support comprehensive pension reform legislation. The enactment of ERISA in September 1974 recast federal policy for private pension plans by making worker security an overriding objective of federal law.
















Retirement Security


Book Description

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) established minimum standards and requirements governing the design and operation of private pension plans. Responsibilities for carrying out the Act are assigned to the Department of Labor, the Internal Revenue Service, and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. As of mid-1977, 471,341 (93 percent) of the private pension plans had fewer than 100 participants. About 18 percent of the plans had terminated, and 82 percent continued. In order to meet ERISA's participation and vesting standards, almost all of the defined benefit and defined contribution plans had to be revised, and about 58 percent of the Keogh plans required revision. Employers spent over $500 million in administrative costs resulting from the Act; about 67 percent of these costs were one-time costs for revising the plans to meet the Act's requirements, and about 33 percent were increased annual administrative costs. Some of the annual reporting requirements have been eliminated in order to reduce the administrative costs of the pension plans.




Pension Security Act of 2003


Book Description







The Pension Security Act


Book Description