The Roads (Scotland) Act 1984 (Fixed Penalty) Amendment Regulations 2011


Book Description

Enabling power: Roads (Scotland) Act 1984, sch. 8B, para. 2. Issued: 16.02.2011. Made: 10.02.2011. Laid before the Scottish Parliament: 14.02.2011. Coming into force: 01.04.2011. Effect: S.S.I. 2008/243 amended. Territorial extent & classification: S. General




The Roads (Scotland) Act 1984 (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017


Book Description

Enabling power: European Communities Act 1972, s. 2 (2) & Finance Act 1973, s. 56. Issued: 04.05.2017. Made: 26.04.2017. Laid before the Scottish Parliament: -. Coming into force: 16.05.2017. Effect: 1984 c.54 amended. Territorial extent & classification: S. General. EC note: These regs implement in relation to construction projects for new roads to which Part III of the 1984 Act applies, and improvement and maintenance projects for roads to which Part IV of the 1984 Act applies, Directive 2011/92/EU as amended by Directive 2014/52/EU










Parliamentary Debates (Hansard).


Book Description




Road Traffic (Driver Licensing and Information Systems) Act 1989


Book Description

Road Traffic (Driver Licensing and Information Systems) Act 1989 (UK) The Law Library presents the official text of the Road Traffic (Driver Licensing and Information Systems) Act 1989 (UK). Updated as of March 26, 2018 This book contains: - The complete text of the Road Traffic (Driver Licensing and Information Systems) Act 1989 (UK) - A table of contents with the page number of each section







Roundabouts


Book Description

TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 672: Roundabouts: An Informational Guide - Second Edition explores the planning, design, construction, maintenance, and operation of roundabouts. The report also addresses issues that may be useful in helping to explain the trade-offs associated with roundabouts. This report updates the U.S. Federal Highway Administration's Roundabouts: An Informational Guide, based on experience gained in the United States since that guide was published in 2000.




Scotland Analysis


Book Description

The UK Government is undertaking a major cross-government programme of analysis prior to the referendum on Scottish independence in 2014. The aim is to provide a comprehensive and detailed analysis of Scotland's place in the UK. This paper, the first of a series to be published in 2013 and 2014, examines the UK's constitutional set-up and the legal implications of independence. The UK Government is convinced that the current devolution offers the best for Scotland: the Scottish Parliament and Government are empowered to take decisions on a range of domestic policy areas - such as health, education, policing - while Scotland continues to benefit from decisions made for the UK as a whole - defence and security, foreign representation, economic affairs. Independence is very different to devolution. Based on independent expert opinion (published as Annex A), the paper concludes that if there were to be a vote in favour of leaving the UK, Scotland would become an entirely new state whilst the remainder of the UK would continue as before, retaining the rights and obligations of the UK as it currently stands. Any separation would have to be negotiated between both governments. Legal and practical implications of independence, both at home and abroad, are addressed. An independent Scotland would have to apply to and/or negotiate to become a member of whichever international organisations it wished to join, including the EU and NATO. Scotland would also have to work through its positions on thousands of international treaties to which the UK is currently party.




Report on Similar Fact Evidence and the Moorov Doctrine


Book Description

As the law stands, the prosecution in Scotland cannot rely upon previous convictions to help prove their case against an accused person. If an accused, charged with murder, has been convicted of a number of other murders, the jury will not know this when considering their verdict. Other jurisdictions - most notably England and Wales - have rules which allow such evidence. Should Scots law be changed? In this report the Scottish Law Commission conclude that the present rules restricting the use of evidence that the accused has acted in a similar way on other occasions - including evidence that he or she has committed similar crimes - lack both logic and coherence. It recommends that the law recognise that such evidence can be highly relevant to the question of guilt or innocence. The report argues that all relevant evidence - including evidence of similar previous convictions - should, in principle, be admissible. Included with the report is a draft Bill which would give effect to the recommendations by replacing the present law with a clear and coherent statutory framework for the admission of all relevant evidence in criminal proceedings.