Concrete Quality Assurance Using Accelerated Strength Testing


Book Description

This report provides additional information and guidance to division laboratories and field offices within the Corps of Engineers on the use of accelerated strength testing for predicting potential compressive strengths of concrete and assuring the quality of concrete production. The Richard B. Russell Dam test results were analyzed using a regression equation developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers South Atlantic Division Laboratory (SADL). The Lock and Dam No. 1 test results were analyzed using a Regression equation developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station (WES) Structures Laboratory. The report concludes that accelerated strength testing can apparently predict concrete potential compressive strengths and assure proper quality control of concrete production if a valid regression equation is developed. The regression equation may be developed fom laboratory or field test data. The regression analysis should use a minimum of 30 sets of test data which have a broad strength range. If project materials charge during the course of construction, a new linear regression analysis must be performed using compressive strength data representing concrete made from the new materials.




Chapter 13--Accelerated Strength Tests


Book Description

Rapid construction practices throughout the concrete industry have brought increasing pressure on specifying agencies to assess the quality of concrete at an earlier age than 7 or 28 days after placement. Currently, the later age is still specified for compression tests of 152 by 304-mm (6 by 12-in.) cylinders of concrete as delivered to the job site in order to determine quality. During the 28-day period, it is not unusual for a multistory building to rise several floors before the strength tests are conducted. This situation is considered by many to be too precarious for construction to proceed on a sound technical basis and with adequate assurance of safety. Furthermore, extensive and costly delays are encountered when 28-day test results are low, since a field investigation may be necessary to verify the load-carrying capacity of the structure. Further delay is certain if concrete must be reinforced or replaced. Conversely, economics dictate that work continue without knowing quality, thus setting the stage for a catastrophic collision between advancing construction technology and the price owners are willing to pay for their capital facilities. Surely, an earlier assessment of concrete quality is absolutely essential.