Unalienable Rights


Book Description

The America of our forefathers, the ideals of liberty established in a republic protected by a constitution and government, does not exist today. We have progressed in nearly every area of our human existence, except we seem to have forgotten or lost the true meaning of our countryas freedom. In an effort to help spark a renewed understanding of what we have lost, this book discusses the following concepts: Federal jurisdiction. Federal welfare schemes. aFederala citizenship. Presidential decrees. Judicial legislation. Federal monetary failure. Unconstitutional tax enforcement. Unconstitutional emergency powers acts. The demonization of Americaas militia. Usurping the peopleas right to keep and bear arms. Why the government wonat stop illegal immigration. Property rights stolen from all Americans. Excessive limitations on free speech. Curtailment of your Fourth Amendment rights. Misapplication of emergency powers. The missing common law. The missing rights of the citizens. The fraud of the Sixteenth Amendment.




Scientific Proof of Our Unalienable Rights. a Road to Utopia


Book Description

"This book begins with an awakening of something old, often quoted, seldom elaborated, and eager to understand why Thomas Jefferson, in the Declaration of Independence, failed to prove his stated 'self-evident' claim that our unalienable rights are part of the Laws of Nature. Mystified by educational institutions' lack of interest to such a profound statement, this book covers the first known scientific proof to Jefferson's claim, taking the discourse out of the ivory tower for all to understand. The simplicity of the proof takes us on a journey demonstrating our unalienable rights is the origin of philosophy, behind the 'taming of fire' among many other worders, highlighting the connection of manmade laws to the Laws of Nature, the foundation to the Laws of Economics, the maturity of morality, and so on. Our journey ends on the road to utopia realizing the concepts of this book will spread through time and humankind will one day take the road less traveled. This road connects our unalienable rights to Nature's matrix, advancing humanity's intellectural evolution of living-systems throughout the universe; and in the end, awakening something old, as in making this world a better place to live."--P. [4] of cover.







Our Declaration: A Reading of the Declaration of Independence in Defense of Equality


Book Description

“A tour de force.... No one has ever written a book on the Declaration quite like this one.” —Gordon Wood, New York Review of Books Winner of the Zócalo Book Prize Winner of the Society of American Historians’ Francis Parkman Prize Winner of the Chicago Tribune’s Heartland Prize (Nonfiction) Finalist for the Zora Neale Hurston/Richard Wright Foundation Hurston Wright Legacy Award Shortlisted for the PEN/John Kenneth Galbraith Award for Nonfiction Shortlisted for the Phi Beta Kappa Society’s Ralph Waldo Emerson Award A New York Times Book Review Editors Choice Selection Featured on the front page of the New York Times, Our Declaration is already regarded as a seminal work that reinterprets the promise of American democracy through our founding text. Combining a personal account of teaching the Declaration with a vivid evocation of the colonial world between 1774 and 1777, Allen, a political philosopher renowned for her work on justice and citizenship reveals our nation’s founding text to be an animating force that not only changed the world more than two-hundred years ago, but also still can. Challenging conventional wisdom, she boldly makes the case that the Declaration is a document as much about political equality as about individual liberty. Beautifully illustrated throughout, Our Declaration is an “uncommonly elegant, incisive, and often poetic primer on America’s cardinal text” (David M. Kennedy).




The Origination of Unalienable Rights


Book Description

What are our unalienable rights and, maybe even more importantly, where do they originate from? If we knew where our rights actually originated from, perhaps we might be able to keep them. Author Bio: Christopher Alan Anderson (1950 - ) received the basis of his education from the University of Science and Philosophy, Swannanoa, Waynesboro, Virginia. He resides in the transcendental/romantic tradition, that vein of spiritual creativity of the philosopher and poet. His quest has been to define and express an eternal romantic reality from which a man and a woman could together stand in their difference and create a living universe of procreative love. Mr. Anderson began these writings in 1971. The first writings were published in 1985. On a personal note, when Mr. Anderson was asked to describe the writings and what he felt their message was he responded, "Spiritual procreation. Mankind has yet to distinguish the two sexes on the spiritual level. In this failure lies the root of our problems and why we cannot yet touch the eternal together. The message of man and woman balance brings each of us together in love with our eternal other half right now." Keywords: Man and Woman Balance, Relationships, Procreation, Spirituality, Love, Metaphysics, Eternal, Creation, Sexuality, & Soul.




Unalienable Rights Course, Form #12.038


Book Description




What Ever Happened to Our Unalienable Rights?


Book Description

A concise look into the distinctions necessary for an individual or a people to declare and defend unalienable rights (freedom).




Rights from Wrongs


Book Description

A noted legal scholar examines the source of human rights, arguing that rights are the result of particular experiences with injustice and looking at the implications in terms of the right to privacy, voting rights, and other rights.




What's Wrong with Rights?


Book Description

What's Wrong with Rights? argues that contemporary rights-talk obscures the importance civic virtue, military effectiveness and the democratic law legitimacy. It draws upon legal and moral philosophy, moral theology, and court judgments. It spans discussions from medieval Christendom to contemporary debates about justified killing.