USDA ELECTRONIC FILING: Progress Made, But Central Leadership and Comprehensive Implementation Plan Needed


Book Description

On June 20, 2000, the President signed the Freedom to E-File Act (P.L. 106-222), requiring the Department of Agriculture (USDA) to establish an electronic filing and retrieval system enabling farmers and other agricultural producers to access and file paperwork electronically with the department. Provisions of the act set forth separate implementation requirements and deadlines for USDA's county-based agencies (CBA) the Farm Service Agency (FSA), the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), and the Rural Development (RD) mission areas and for USDA's Risk Management Agency (RMA). At your request, we reviewed measures being taken by USDA to implement the act and briefed your office on the results of our work on November 15, 2000. The briefing slides are included in appendix I.




USDA Electronic Filing


Book Description

GAO-01-324 USDA Electronic Filing: Progress Made, But Central Leadership and Comprehensive Implementation Plan Needed




USDA Electronic Filing


Book Description




A Guide for Accredited Veterinarians


Book Description




Definition of Pain and Distress and Reporting Requirements for Laboratory Animals


Book Description

In this first in a proposed series of workshops on regulatory issues in animal care and use, the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) has addressed the existing and proposed requirements for reporting pain and distress in laboratory animals. The Animal Welfare Act, administered by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), mandates that pain and distress in laboratory animals be minimized. USDA is considering two policy changes with regard to this specific mandate. Firstly, since there has been no functional definition of "distress," USDA has prepared such a definition and requested feedback from the scientific community on its usefulness for regulatory and reporting requirements. The second issue concerns the pain and distress categorization scheme for reporting to USDA. Various groups and individuals have questioned the efficacy of the current categories, and specific changes have been proposed by the Humane Society of the United States. USDA is considering these and other potential changes to the existing scheme. Thus, given these potential changes to animal welfare policy, the aim of the ILAR/NIH joint workshop was to provide feedback to the USDA. The speakers were asked to address these two issues as well as to comment upon whether the information contained in the 1992 ILAR report Recognition and Alleviation of Pain and Distress in Laboratory Animals is still useful to investigators in assisting them to comply with regulations. The speakers provided perspectives based on their individual expertise in the areas of science of pain and distress, animal welfare policy, protocol review, and/or as representatives of relevant organizations or institutions. The following proceedings are an edited transcript of their presentations.







Standards and Labeling Policy Book


Book Description