Washington V. Davis (1976)


Book Description













Equal Protection


Book Description

Senator Howard's speech introducing the Fourteenth Amendment to Congress (May 23, 1866) -- Strauder v. West Virginia (March 1, 1880) -- The civil rights cases (October 15, 1883) -- Yick Wo v. Hopkins (May 10, 1886) -- Plessy v. Ferguson (May 18, 1896) -- Justice Harlan's "Great Dissent" in Plessy v. Ferguson (May 18, 1896) -- Korematsu v. United States (December 18, 1944) -- Shelley v. Kraemer (May 3, 1948) -- Sweatt v. Painter (June 5, 1950) -- Hernandez v. Texas (May 3, 1954) -- Brown v. Board of Education (May 17, 1954) -- President Johnson's commencement address at Howard University (June 4, 1965) -- Loving v. Virginia (June 12, 1967) -- Graham v. Richardson (June 14, 1971) -- Reed v. Reed (November 22, 1971) -- In re Griffiths (June 25, 1973) -- Washington v. Davis (June 7, 1976) -- Craig v. Boren (December 20, 1976) -- Bakke v. University of California (June 28, 1978) -- Ambach v. Norwick (April 17, 1979) -- Plyler v. Doe (June 15, 1982) -- Batson v. Kentucky (April 30, 1986) -- McCleskey v. Kemp (April 22, 1987) -- Justice Marshall's Bicentennial Speech (May 6, 1987) -- Romer v. Evans (May 20, 1996) -- United States v. Virginia (June 26, 1996) -- Justice Breyer's speech on the 50th anniversary of the Brown Decision (May 17, 2004) -- Johnson v. California (February 23, 2005) -- Justice Ginsburg's speech on gender discrimination (February 10, 2006) -- Obergefell v. Hodges (June 26, 2015) -- President Obama's statement on the Obergefell Decision (June 26, 2015)




Blinded by Sight


Book Description

Colorblindness has become an integral part of the national conversation on race in America. Given the assumptions behind this influential metaphor—that being blind to race will lead to racial equality—it's curious that, until now, we have not considered if or how the blind "see" race. Most sighted people assume that the answer is obvious: they don't, and are therefore incapable of racial bias—an example that the sighted community should presumably follow. In Blinded by Sight,Osagie K. Obasogie shares a startling observation made during discussions with people from all walks of life who have been blind since birth: even the blind aren't colorblind—blind people understand race visually, just like everyone else. Ask a blind person what race is, and they will more than likely refer to visual cues such as skin color. Obasogie finds that, because blind people think about race visually, they orient their lives around these understandings in terms of who they are friends with, who they date, and much more. In Blinded by Sight, Obasogie argues that rather than being visually obvious, both blind and sighted people are socialized to see race in particular ways, even to a point where blind people "see" race. So what does this mean for how we live and the laws that govern our society? Obasogie delves into these questions and uncovers how color blindness in law, public policy, and culture will not lead us to any imagined racial utopia.




The Burger Court and the Rise of the Judicial Right


Book Description

The magnitude of the Burger Court has been underestimated by historians. When Richard Nixon ran for president in 1968, "Impeach Earl Warren" billboards dotted the landscape, especially in the South. Nixon promised to transform the Supreme Court--and with four appointments, including a new chief justice, he did. This book tells the story of the Supreme Court that came in between the liberal Warren Court and the conservative Rehnquist and Roberts Courts: the seventeen years, 1969 to 1986, under Chief Justice Warren Burger. It is a period largely written off as a transitional era at the Supreme Court when, according to the common verdict, "nothing happened." How wrong that judgment is. The Burger Court had vitally important choices to make: whether to push school desegregation across district lines; how to respond to the sexual revolution and its new demands for women's equality; whether to validate affirmative action on campuses and in the workplace; whether to shift the balance of criminal law back toward the police and prosecutors; what the First Amendment says about limits on money in politics. The Burger Court forced a president out of office while at the same time enhancing presidential power. It created a legacy that in many ways continues to shape how we live today. Written with a keen sense of history and expert use of the justices' personal papers, this book sheds new light on an important era in American political and legal history.--Adapted from dust jacket.




Implicit Racial Bias Across the Law


Book Description

This book explores how scientific evidence on the human mind might help to explain why racial equality is so elusive. Through the lens of powerful and pervasive implicit racial attitudes and stereotypes, it examines both the continued subordination of historically disadvantaged groups and the legal system's complicity in the subordination.




Was Blind, But Now I See


Book Description

Law professor Flagg contends that most white people associate race with skin pigment: the less someone has of the latter, the less they have of the former. Thinking they have no race therefore, they proclaim their decisions to be race-neutral when they actually reflect white race-specific norms that are invisible to them. She shows how the blindness translates into institutional racism in laws, and suggests some reforms. Annotation copyrighted by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR




The US Supreme Court and the Centralization of Federal Authority


Book Description

Traces the US Supreme Court’s effect on federal government growth from the founding era forward. This book explores the US Supreme Court’s impact on the constitutional development of the federal government from the founding era forward. The author’s research is based on an original database of several hundred landmark decisions compiled from constitutional law casebooks and treatises published between 1822 and 2010. By rigorously and systematically interpreting these decisions, he determines the extent to which the court advanced and consolidated national governing authority. The result is a portrait of how the high court, regardless of constitutional issue and ideology, persistently expanded the reach and scope of the federal government. “Dichio takes a fairly unique approach to thinking about the relationship between the US Supreme Court and the development of the American state. Scholars interested in American political development and historical work on the law and the courts should grapple with the evidence on offer here.” — Keith E. Whittington, coauthor of American Constitutionalism, Second Edition