Calibration of AASHTO LRFD Concrete Bridge Design Specifications for Serviceability


Book Description

The notion of limit state is fundamental in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (AASHTO LRFD). A limit state is defined as the boundary between acceptable and unacceptable performance of the structure or its component. The strength, or ultimate, limit states (ULS) of the AASHTO LRFD are calibrated through structural-reliability theory to achieve a certain level of safety. Exceeding the strength limit state results in a collapse or failure, an event that should not occur any time during the lifetime of the structure. Therefore, there is a need for an adequate safety margin expressed in the form of a target reliability index, BT. For bridge girders, the target reliability is taken as, BT = 3.5. The strength limit states do not consider the integration of the daily, seasonal, and long-term service stresses that directly affect long-term bridge performance and subsequent service life. The current service limit states (SLS) of the AASHTO LRFD are intended to ensure a serviceable bridge for the design life; assumed to be 75 years in AASHTO LRFD. When the SLS is exceeded, repair or replacement of components may be needed, repeatedly exceeding SLS can lead to deterioration and eventually collapse or failure (ULS). In general, SLS can be exceeded but the frequency and magnitude have to be within acceptable limits. The current service limit states are based upon the traditional serviceability provisions of the Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges. They are formulated to achieve component proportions similar to those of the Standard Specifications. However, these service limit states were not calibrated using reliability theory to truly achieve uniform probability of exceedence as the tools and data necessary to accomplish this calibration were not available to the code writers when AASHTO LRFD was developed. Currently, the development of calibrated service limit states remains a difficult task due to the lack of clear consequences of exceeding the SLS. This report presents the work performed on calibrating the service limit states related to concrete bridges in AASHTO LRFD.




Calibration of AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications


Book Description

It is important to develop and incorporate the knowledge needed to design, construct, and maintain bridges to have the longest service life as possible. Consequently, the fatigue effects on bridges need to be considered and more accurately reflected within the proper bridge design specifications. This thesis describes the calibration process used to select the load and resistance factors for the fatigue limit states of steel bridge members within the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. The process presented within this thesis builds upon work completed as part of the Strategic Highway Research Program No. 2 including the determination of the fatigue load model. The resistance model was developed using available fatigue test data and statistically analyzed using specially developed techniques. Load and resistance factors were finally chosen for both Fatigue I and Fatigue II service limit states. We expect the new load and resistance factors for the fatigue service limit states to more accurately capture the fatigue effects of steel bridges and thus increase their service life.




Development and Calibration of AASHTO LRFD Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires, and Traffic Signals


Book Description

"TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 796: Development and Calibration of AASHTO LRFD Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires, and Traffic Signals provides specifications for structural supports of highway signs, luminaires, and traffic signals for consideration and inclusion in the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) load and resistance factor design (LRFD) methodology. The report includes the Research Report, which documents the entire research effort, and the Appendix A: Calibration Report. Appendix B: AASHTO LRFD Specifications will be published by AASHTO. Other appendices are available on the TRB website, including: Appendix C: Design Examples, Appendix D: Survey Results, Appendix E: Fatigue Resistance Comparisons."--Publisher's description.







Protocols for Collecting and Using Traffic Data in Bridge Design


Book Description

TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 683: Protocols for Collecting and Using Traffic Data in Bridge Design explores a set of protocols and methodologies for using available recent truck traffic data to develop and calibrate vehicular loads for superstructure design, fatigue design, deck design, and design for overload permits. The protocols are geared to address the collection, processing, and use of national weigh-in-motion (WIM) data. The report also gives practical examples of implementing these protocols with recent national WIM data drawn from states/sites around the country with different traffic exposures, load spectra, and truck configurations. The material in this report will be of immediate interest to bridge engineers. This report replaces NCHRP Web-Only Document 135: Protocols for Collecting and Using Traffic Data in Bridge Design. Appendices A through F for NCHRP Report 683 are available only online.




Practices for Local Calibration of LRFD Geotechnical Resistance Factors


Book Description

More than 15 years have passed since the U.S. transportation industry started its transition from allowable stress design (ASD) to load and resistance factor design (LRFD). For geotechnical design, the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications includes provisions that allow state departments of transportation (DOTs) to develop their own design methods and resistance factors. The TRB National Cooperative Highway Research Program's NCHRP Synthesis 601: Practices for Local Calibration of LRFD Geotechnical Resistance Factors documents the extent to which state DOTs have developed agency-specific geotechnical design methods and resistance factors and also details the challenges of the development and benefits resulting from implementation of the methods.




AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Guide Specifications for GFRP-reinforced Concrete Bridge Decks and Traffic Railings


Book Description

Glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) materials have emerged as an alternative material for producing reinforcing bars for concrete structures. GFRP reinforcing bars offer advantages over steel reinforcement due to their noncorrosive nature and nonconductive behavior. Due to other differences in the physical and mechanical behavior of GFRP materials as opposed to steel, unique guidance on the engineering and construction of concrete bridge decks reinforced with GFRP bars is needed. These guide specifications offer a description of the unique material properties of GFRP composite materials as well as provisions for the design and construction of concrete bridge decks and railings reinforced with GFRP reinforcing bars.




Numerical Modelling of Discrete Materials in Geotechnical Engineering, Civil Engineering and Earth Sciences


Book Description

In this fully up-to-date volume, important new developments and applications of discrete element modelling are highlighted and brought together for presentation at the First International UDEC/3DEC Symposium. Papers covered the following key areas: * behaviour of masonry structures (walls, bridges, towers, columns) * stability and deformation of tunnels and caverns in fractured rock masses * geomechanical modelling for mining and waste repositories * rock reinforcement design (anchors, shotcrete, bolts) * mechanical and hydro-mechanical behaviour of dams and foundations * rock slope stability, deformation and failure mechanisms * modelling of fundamental rock mechanical problems * modelling of geological processes * constitutive laws for fractured rock masses and masonry structures * dynamic behaviour of discrete structures. Numerical Modelling of Discrete Materials in Geotechnical Engineering, Civil Engineering, and Earth Sciences provides an ultra-modern, in-depth analysis of discrete element modelling in a range of different fields, thus proving valuable reading for civil, mining, and geotechnical engineers, as well as other interested professionals.




AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications


Book Description




AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications


Book Description

"The provisions of these Specifications are intended for the design, evaluation and rehabilitation of both fixed and movable highway bridges. Mechanical, electrical, and special vehicular and pedestrian safety aspects of movable bridges, however, are not covered. Provisions are not included for bridges used solely for railway, rail transit or public utilities. For bridges not fully covered herein, the provisions of these Specifications mat be applied, as augmented with additional design criteria where required. These specifications are not intended to supplant proper training or the exercise of judgment by the Designer, and state only the minimum requirements necessary to provide for public safety. The Owner or the Designer may require the sophistication of design or the quality of materials and construction to be higher than the minimum requirements. The concept of safety through redundancy and ductility, and protection against scour and collision are emphasized. The design provisions of these Specifications employ the Load and Resistance Factor Design, LRFD, methodology. The factors have been developed from the theory of reliability based upon current statistical knowledge of loads and structural performance. Methods of analysis, other than those included in previous Specifications, and the modelling techniques inherent in them are included, and their use is encouraged. The commentary is not intended to provide a complete historical background concerning the development of these, or previous Specifications, nor is it intended to provide a detailed summary of the studies and research data reviewed in formulating the provisions of the Specification. However, references to some of the research data are provided for those who wish to study the background material in depth. The commentary directs attention to other documents that provide suggestions for carrying out the requirements and intent of these Specifications. However, those documents and this commentary are not intended to be a part of these Specifications."--Page1-1.