Book Description

During hydraulic fracturing treatments, proppants - usually sand - are placed inside fractures to improve fracture conductivity. However, a large portion of the generated hydraulic fractures often remain unpropped after fracturing treatments. There are two primary reasons for this poor proppant placement. First, proppants settle quickly in common fracturing fluids (e.g., slickwater), which results in unpropped sections at the tip or top of the fracture. Second, a large number of the microfractures are too narrow to accommodate any common commercial proppant. Such unpropped fractures hold a large potential flow capacity as they exhibit a large contact area with the reservoir. However, their potential flow capacity is diminished during production due to closing of unpropped fractures because of closure stress. In this study, fractures are categorized as wider fractures, which are accessible to proppant, and narrower fractures, which are inaccessible to proppant. For wider fractures, proppant transport is important as proppant is needed for keeping them open. For narrower fractures, a chemical formulation is proposed as there is less physical restriction for fluids to flow inside across them. The chemical formulation is expected to improve fracture conductivity by generating roughness on fracture surfaces. This dissertation uses experiments and simulations to investigate proppant transport in a complex fracture network with laboratory-scale transparent fracture slots. Proppant size, injection flow rate and bypass fracture angle are varied and their effects are systematically evaluated. Based on experimental results, a straight-line relationship can be used to quantify the fraction of proppant that flows into bypass fractures with the total amount of proppant injected. A Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model is developed to simulate the experiments; both qualitative and quantitative matches are achieved with this model. It is concluded that the fraction of proppant which flows into bypass fractures could be small unless a significant amount of proppant is injected, which indicates the inefficiency of slickwater in transporting proppant. An alternative fracturing fluid - foam - has been proposed to improve proppant placement because of its proppant carrying capacity. Foam is not a single-phase fluid, and it suffers liquid drainage with time due to gravity. Additionally, the existence of foam bubbles and lamellae could alter the movement of proppants. Experiments and simulations are performed to evaluate proppant placement in field-scale foam fracturing application. A liquid drainage model and a proppant settling correlation are developed and incorporated into an in-housing fracturing simulator. Results indicate that liquid drainage could negatively affect proppant placement, while dry foams could lead to negligible proppant settling and consequently uniform proppant placement. For narrower fractures, two chemical stimulation techniques are proposed to improve fracture conductivity by increasing fracture surface roughness. The first is a nanoparticle-microencapsulated acid (MEA) system for shale acidizing applications, and the second is a new technology which can generate mineral crystals on the shale surface to act as in-situ proppants. The MEA could be released as the fracture closes and the released acid could etch the surface of the rock locally, in a non-uniform way, to improve fracture conductivity (up to 40 times). Furthermore, the in-situ proppant generation technology can lead to crystal growth in both fracking water and formation brine conditions, and it also improves fracture conductivity (up to 10 times) based on core flooding experiments