Evaluation of MMFX Steel for Concrete Bridge Decks


Book Description

Commercially available Micro-Composite, Multi-Structural, Formable (MMFX) steel reinforcing bars are a proprietary product claiming to provide both high tensile strength and excellent corrosion-resistance when compared to conventional Grade 60 steel. Use of MMFX steel reinforcement could potentially lead to significant cost savings due to these unique characteristics. Recently, many state transportation departments, including the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), have begun to use MMFX steel as a direct replacement for conventional steel in reinforced concrete bridge decks. However, the behavior of bridge decks reinforced with MMFX steel bars was previously undocumented. In light of this fact, a research program was commissioned by the NCDOT in which three concrete bridge decks, each having a span-to-depth ratio of 12.5, were constructed and tested to failure under simulated truck wheel loads. Two of the decks were constructed with identical reinforcement ratios, one utilizing conventional Grade 60 steel and the other MMFX steel. The third bridge deck was also reinforced with MMFX steel, but was reinforced with 33 percent less steel in an attempt to utilize the higher tensile strength offered by MMFX. The results of the experimental program demonstrate that taking advantage of lowered reinforcement ratios by utilizing the higher strength of MMFX steel is a definite possibility in reinforced concrete bridge decks. The bridge deck reinforced with 33 percent less MMFX steel developed the same load-carrying capacity as the deck reinforced with conventional Grade 60 steel. In addition, the same deck showed the same deflections at service load as the deck reinforced with Grade 60 steel.






















Behavior of Concrete Bridges Reinforced with High-Performance Steel Reinforcing Bars


Book Description

High-performance (HP) steel reinforcing bars are characterized by their high tensile strength and enhanced corrosion resistance in comparison to conventional ASTM A 615 Grade 60 steel. Use of HP steel in concrete bridges could lead to potential savings by reducing the amount of steel required based on its higher strength characteristics and expanding the service life of bridges due to its enhanced corrosion resistance. A commercially available steel know Micro-Composite Multi-Structural Formable (MMFX) steel which is conforming to ASTM A 1035, was selected for this study because of its high tensile strength and enhanced corrosion resistance. Comprehensive experimental and analytical programs were carried out to evaluate the mechanical properties of the HP steel bars, its bond characteristics, and the behavior of concrete bridge decks reinforced with HP steel. Research findings showed that HP steel used in this study exhibited much higher tensile strength than that of conventional Grade 60. In addition, the HP steel bars had much lower corrosion rate than Grade 60 bars. Bending HP steel bars reduce its ultimate strength and strain by 6 and 70 percent, respectively. However, when HP steel bent bars are bonded to concrete they develop their full stress-strain capacity. Bond test results indicated that a stress level up to 90 ksi can be developed in #8 HP steel bars without the use of transverse reinforcement. The use of transverse reinforcement increases the bond strength of HP steel reinforcing bars, consequently reaching stress levels in the bars up to 150 ksi. When possible, it is recommended to use a minimum amount of transverse reinforcement to confine spliced bars to ensure ductile behavior and provide warning prior to failure. Direct replacement of Grade 60 with HP steel bars in bridge decks is a conservative approach. However, reducing the amount of HP steel by 33 percent does not impair the ultimate-load carrying capacity or alter the serviceability behavior o.




Structural Design Guidelines for Concrete Bridge Decks Reinforced with Corrosion-Resistant Reinforcing Bars


Book Description

This research program develops and validates structural design guidelines and details for concrete bridge decks with corrosion-resistant reinforcing (CRR) bars. A two-phase experimental program was conducted where a control test set consistent with a typical Virginia Department of Transportation bridge deck design using Grade 60 steel (ASTM A615, fy = 60 ksi) and epoxy-coated reinforcing steel was compared to deck slab specimens where Grade 60 is replaced with CRR bars. The experimental program was designed to evaluate how flexural performance at service and ultimate limit states are affected by a one-to-one replacement of Grade 60 with CRR bars, a reduction of concrete clear cover, and a reduction in rebar size. Structural analysis models were developed using Response 2000 in order to predict the CRR bridge deck moment-curvature and the moment-crack width relationships. Experimental trends proved to be consistent with the analytical results demonstrating the viability of Response 2000 as a design tool for reinforced concrete with high-strength and nonmetallic rebar without a defined yield plateau. For reduced bar size and clear cover (2.00 in instead 2.50 in), ASTM A1035 and UNS S32304 specimens proved to have similar deformability ratios and crack widths that comply with current AASHTO requirements, with as much as 36% less steel.