Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Report, David Global Communications Site
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 619 pages
File Size : 50,27 MB
Release : 1994
Category :
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 619 pages
File Size : 50,27 MB
Release : 1994
Category :
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : pages
File Size : 35,68 MB
Release : 1889
Category :
ISBN :
Author : CH2M HILL
Publisher :
Page : 834 pages
File Size : 34,3 MB
Release : 1994
Category :
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 208 pages
File Size : 27,78 MB
Release : 1994
Category :
ISBN :
Author : Benchmark Environmental Engineering & Science
Publisher :
Page : pages
File Size : 28,9 MB
Release : 2006
Category : Hazardous waste site remediation
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : pages
File Size : 10,86 MB
Release : 2005
Category :
ISBN :
This manual provides detailed guidance on Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Studies (RI/FSs) conducted pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) at Department of Energy (DOE) facilities. The purpose of the RI/FS, to assess the risk posed by a hazardous waste site and to determine the best way to reduce that risk, and its structure (site characterization, risk assessment, screening and detailed analysis of alternatives, etc.) is defined in the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) and further explained in the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA (Interim Final) 540/G-89/004, OSWER Directive 9355.3-01, October 1988. Though issued in 1988, the EPA guidance remains an excellent source of information on the conduct and structure of an RI/FS. This document makes use of supplemental RI/FS-related guidance that EPA has developed since its initial document was issued in 1988, incorporates practical lessons learned in more than 12 years of experience in CERCLA hazardous site remediation, and drawing on those lessons, introduces the Streamlined Approach For Environmental Restoration (SAFER), developed by DOE as a way to proceed quickly and efficiently through the RI/FS process at DOE facilities. Thus as its title implies, this guidance is intended to describe in detail the process and component elements of an RI/FS, as well as techniques to manage the RI/FS effectively.
Author :
Publisher :
Page : pages
File Size : 43,91 MB
Release : 2010
Category : Hazardous waste site remediation
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 231 pages
File Size : 24,31 MB
Release : 1996
Category :
ISBN :
This remedial investigation (RI)/feasibility study (FS) supports the selection of remedial actions for the David Witherspoon, Inc. 901 Maryville Pike Site in Knoxville, Tennessee. Operations at the site, used as a recycling center, have resulted in past, present, and potential future releases of hazardous substances in to the environment. This Site is a Tennessee Superfund site. A phased approach was planned to (1) gather existing data from previous investigations managed by the Tenn. Dept. of Environment and Conservation; (2) perform a preliminary RI, including risk assessments, and an FS with existing data to identify areas where remedial action may be necessary; (3) gather additional field data to adequately define the nature and extent of risk-based contaminants that present identifiable threats to human and/or ecological receptors; and (4) develop remedial action alternatives to reduce risks to acceptable levels.
Author : United States. Department of Energy. RCRA/CERCLA Division
Publisher :
Page : pages
File Size : 11,7 MB
Release : 1993
Category : Hazardous waste sites
ISBN :
Author :
Publisher :
Page : pages
File Size : 35,45 MB
Release : 2001
Category :
ISBN :
This document contains the appendixes for the remedial investigation and feasibility study for the David Witherspoon, Inc., 901 site in Knoxville, Tennessee. The following topics are covered in the appendixes: (A) David Witherspoon, Inc., 901 Site Historical Data, (B) Fieldwork Plans for the David Witherspoon, Inc., 901 Site, (C) Risk Assessment, (D) Remediation Technology Discussion, (E) Engineering Support Documentation, (F) Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements, and (G) Cost Estimate Documentation.